Dyno'd the CL65 Today
Dyno'd the CL65 Today
I dyno'd the car today on the same DynoDynamics dyno that I ran a baseline on a month ago.
Stock the car hit 509 HP / 655 TQ, and it was 85-90F in the shop. The HP number is from the first pull, and the TQ number was from the second. The TQ didn't register on the first run. The car dropped 10HP from pull 1 to pull 2, so my guess is the 655 TQ would have been 665.
Today it hit 558 HP / 720 TQ, temp was around 70F.
Gains were 49 HP and 65 TQ. Air/Fuel was mid 10's across the board.
Stock the car hit 509 HP / 655 TQ, and it was 85-90F in the shop. The HP number is from the first pull, and the TQ number was from the second. The TQ didn't register on the first run. The car dropped 10HP from pull 1 to pull 2, so my guess is the 655 TQ would have been 665.
Today it hit 558 HP / 720 TQ, temp was around 70F.
Gains were 49 HP and 65 TQ. Air/Fuel was mid 10's across the board.
Re: Dyno'd the CL65 Today
I'd definitely be up for Cat removal or the like, but I don't see a full swap in the cards. I'm too poor and too cheap to throw money at anything unproven these days.
I did buy the parts to create at CAI today for under $45 that aparantly results in an increase of 40 WHP and 40 WTQ. Now that's bang for the buck.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Age: 39
Posts: 6,348
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
Re: Dyno'd the CL65 Today
I'd definitely be up for Cat removal or the like, but I don't see a full swap in the cards. I'm too poor and too cheap to throw money at anything unproven these days.
I did buy the parts to create at CAI today for under $45 that aparantly results in an increase of 40 WHP and 40 WTQ. Now that's bang for the buck.
I did buy the parts to create at CAI today for under $45 that aparantly results in an increase of 40 WHP and 40 WTQ. Now that's bang for the buck.
Re: Dyno'd the CL65 Today
I'd definitely be up for Cat removal or the like, but I don't see a full swap in the cards. I'm too poor and too cheap to throw money at anything unproven these days.
I did buy the parts to create at CAI today for under $45 that aparantly results in an increase of 40 WHP and 40 WTQ. Now that's bang for the buck.
I did buy the parts to create at CAI today for under $45 that aparantly results in an increase of 40 WHP and 40 WTQ. Now that's bang for the buck.
since your oem exhaust is already mandrel bent and fairly large cat delete may be the best bang for the buck
Re: Dyno'd the CL65 Today
anthony the larger exhaust has been proven on just about every car with a turbo setup. on the porsches gains have seen as much as 50 rwhp . downside is much more noise and drone. find the happy medium and you will be happy with the results.
since your oem exhaust is already mandrel bent and fairly large cat delete may be the best bang for the buck
since your oem exhaust is already mandrel bent and fairly large cat delete may be the best bang for the buck
Re: Dyno'd the CL65 Today
I'd love to join next time I'm down.
Re: Dyno'd the CL65 Today
Nice Anthony!!
Does your stock intake suck through a flat vacuum cleaner attachment to?? lol
I thought the crossfire's was bad, until I saw the AMG's lol.
+1 on the cat delete. If 55's get 15 at the wheels from knocking two out I wouldn't even want to know what yours would get Anthony lol.
I thought the crossfire's was bad, until I saw the AMG's lol.
anthony the larger exhaust has been proven on just about every car with a turbo setup. on the porsches gains have seen as much as 50 rwhp . downside is much more noise and drone. find the happy medium and you will be happy with the results.
since your oem exhaust is already mandrel bent and fairly large cat delete may be the best bang for the buck
since your oem exhaust is already mandrel bent and fairly large cat delete may be the best bang for the buck
Re: Dyno'd the CL65 Today
Nice Anthony!!
Does your stock intake suck through a flat vacuum cleaner attachment to?? lol
I thought the crossfire's was bad, until I saw the AMG's lol.
Yea, it's pretty bad.
+1 on the cat delete. If 55's get 15 at the wheels from knocking two out I wouldn't even want to know what yours would get Anthony lol.
Does your stock intake suck through a flat vacuum cleaner attachment to?? lol
I thought the crossfire's was bad, until I saw the AMG's lol.
Yea, it's pretty bad.
+1 on the cat delete. If 55's get 15 at the wheels from knocking two out I wouldn't even want to know what yours would get Anthony lol.
+1
Cats would be all I'd change, as I like quite.
Re: Dyno'd the CL65 Today
I talk to this guy Ahmad every now and then, he likes to entertain my theories cause he's crazy and probably already done most of them lol. But have you thought at all about getting rid of the inner light housings and running to there for the intake? It knocks out the highbeams but I guess he was saying it's good for quite a bit of gain...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
johnnycross413
Troubleshooting & Technical Questions & Modifications
1
03-04-2016 04:49 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)