View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2008, 03:08 AM
chuck65's Avatar
chuck65
chuck65 is offline
Forum Regular
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 303 Protectant VS Armor All

Originally Posted by Ringmaster
From what I understand (**disclaimer - I am not a chemist**) the polymers in plastics and vinyls consist of Bis-(2-ethylhexyl)phthlateakadioctyl phthlate, also known as DOP. This is a plasticiser that makes polymers soft and pliable. It evaporates when exposed to UV light.

The arguments against Armour All are as follows:

*Armour All brings the DOP to the surface and allows it to evaporate quicker.
Many studies show this is true, while others show that this is not the case, so I guess this needs further testing.

*Armour All doesn't block UV, thus allowing the DOP to evaporate.
This is true as far as I know.


*Armour All does not seal the DOP, nor replace it.
This seems to be true also.

Conclusion: Using Armour All will not protect your rubber pads from exposure and *might* increase the evaporation rate.

303 Aerospace Protectant has UV blockers and is not oil based so it will not dry out the surfaces it is used on.
Very logical and well presented Ringmaster, thanks. Thanks Valk & Andrew also.