![]() |
compare xfire performance to other cars, you'll be surprise
I've been reading threads and articles on car magazines about the Xfire being under powered, but if you take a look at this site (http://www.exoticcarsite.com/0-60-qu...mile-times.htm) and compare other cars to the Xfire you should find that you're driving a pretty good autobile with good performance and besides does a half second faster really matter that much to spend 40 grand or more on a car that goes 1 second faster and how many times have you seen someone driving an exotic car here in the state over the speed limit. Also car magazines always complain about the xfire performance but they always seem to over look the low hp performance in some mercedes,audis, porsche and their favorite BMW.
|
Re: compare xfire performance to other cars, you'll be suprise
people have to dawg on it since it is an american car and a chrysler NO NO NO BAD BAD BAD.
This is good because if it were a MB badge i would not be able to afford it lol. |
Re: compare xfire performance to other cars, you'll be surprise
Wow, I was one of the people that thought my car seemed a little weak on paper. But this info changes my perspective.
|
Re: compare xfire performance to other cars, you'll be surprise
Too bad the list doesn't go beyond the '05 models.
|
Re: compare xfire performance to other cars, you'll be surprise
I always thought it would have been nice if Chrysler used the 3.5 engine with, what, another 20-40 hp. But I find the n/a engine to be snappy and I've had mine to 140, so it has adequate power and more than enough to get my license revoked. The SRT6 is a beast, and still a bargain compared to sports cars with equivalent performance.
|
Re: compare xfire performance to other cars, you'll be surprise
I went down a rat hole and imported the data to a spread sheet. I posted it here - the list of cars the Crossfire SRT and N/A beat is pretty impressive. (link is small PDF sorted by 0-60 time)
Updates - Major clean up of the spread sheet and generated PDF files. |
Re: compare xfire performance to other cars, you'll be surprise
I personally would like another 50hp from my coupe, but I wouldn't consider it underpowered though either. The problem is that for the MSRP (mine had a sticker of 37k), it was just a very poor buy for the performance. My old GTI with a sticker of 22k was as fast, if not a touch faster and it had more features, like standard HID lights. And then you have sport compacts like the Mazdaspeed 3 and Cobalt SS turbo which are also much cheaper and much faster.
And then there are the cars the CF competes against. The 350/70z is at least a second quicker in the quarter mile and the Z4 coupe is also a fair amount quicker. The thing to remember is that magnitude of change between various measures of acceleration may not seem like a lot on paper. I mean 1 second is a very short amount of time. But the power and grip required to move a vehicle through the quarter mile 1 second quicker than another vehicle is significant. So you WILL feel the big difference between the car that runs the quarter in 15.0 and one that runs it 14.0 flat. The same holds true, generally, for 0-60. A couple tenths doesn't mean much to me, but once a car is over half a second quicker, things are noticable quicker. But I don't think most owners bought the crossfire because of its performance. It's just a very interesting vehicle. In reality, I think the crossfire is more appropriately classed as a GT car than a true sports car. |
Re: compare xfire performance to other cars, you'll be surprise
It's a matter of perspective. I got mine for the low prices they sell for today. Not bad - a car that can peel back the skin on a number of Ferraris for under $15K - what's not to love!
I was a little surprised a couple months back when dicing with an old Ferrari 308 GTS and had no trouble keeping up and even leaving him behind. I don't think the guy liked it much... Of course along comes an Aston Martin and smokes my fat a$$. Gotta know your limits :) |
Re: compare xfire performance to other cars, you'll be surprise
Originally Posted by ppro
Not bad - a car that can peel back the skin on a number of Ferraris for under $15K - what's not to love!
I was a little surprised a couple months back when dicing with an old Ferrari 308 GTS and had no trouble keeping up and even leaving him behind. I don't think the guy liked it much... Of course along comes an Aston Martin and smokes my fat a$$. Gotta know your limits :) |
Re: compare xfire performance to other cars, you'll be surprise
Originally Posted by AllEuro
That's not really a fair comparison. The ferrari's you're talking about are 20+ yo cars. You could say that the crossfire is faster than any street car built prior to 1950, but so what? The VW I own is faster than my crossfire, so I must be driving a supercar!
308s and mondials aren't really that fast by any stretch of the imagination. But, like the crossfire, they are still cool cars. Owning either car isn't about speed or performance, but feel. Heck, compare the stock tire selection and size of a 308 versus any version of the crossfire. Yeah, that's definitely true. The stock crossfire isn't really about blowning the doors off of anything. It's more about the personal enjoyment of getting behind the wheel. In races like Le Mans we do not have the faster car drivers bragging about beating the slower class drivers. Surely getting the best from a car is reward enough. Coming last in situations like this is no shame, crying about it is. |
Re: compare xfire performance to other cars, you'll be surprise
Originally Posted by ppro
I went down a rat hole and imported the data to a spread sheet. I posted it here - the list of cars the Crossfire SRT and N/A beat is pretty impressive. (link is small PDF sorted by 0-60 time)
Updates - Major clean up of the spread sheet and generated PDF files. |
Re: compare xfire performance to other cars, you'll be surprise
Originally Posted by downwardspiral
I didnt know the acura mdx was that fast haha. I think you deleted a number.
|
Re: compare xfire performance to other cars, you'll be surprise
Originally Posted by AllEuro
That's not really a fair comparison. The ferrari's you're talking about are 20+ yo cars. You could say that the crossfire is faster than any street car built prior to 1950, but so what? The VW I own is faster than my crossfire, so I must be driving a supercar!
308s and mondials aren't really that fast by any stretch of the imagination. But, like the crossfire, they are still cool cars. Owning either car isn't about speed or performance, but feel. Heck, compare the stock tire selection and size of a 308 versus any version of the crossfire. Yeah, that's definitely true. The stock crossfire isn't really about blowning the doors off of anything. It's more about the personal enjoyment of getting behind the wheel. Another reason that the 308 was easy to keep up with or pass could have been because the driver didn't care to play around. Probably more grown up than all that. The point I was making was that the car is a relative bargain (for me anyway), holds it's own very well in looks and relative performance. The data is all subjective. I wonder if anyone is getting a stock N/A from zero to 60 in 6.4 seconds? I've never even tried. For me it's not about drag racing performance, its about the overall package. Except for the iconic styling of the Jag I used to have, I'd take the Crossfire over it in ever other way. |
Re: compare xfire performance to other cars, you'll be surprise
I'm completely satisfied with the performance of both of my cars. The Limited runs about as well as an RX-8 and the SRT is comparable to a Porsche Cayman. The Crossfire looks better than both. Sure, there are faster cars out there but aren't there always?
|
Re: compare xfire performance to other cars, you'll be surprise
Originally Posted by radmanly
I'm completely satisfied with the performance of both of my cars. The Limited runs about as well as an RX-8 and the SRT is comparable to a Porsche Cayman. The Crossfire looks better than both. Sure, there are faster cars out there but aren't there always?
2005 Aero Blue SRT-6 roadster #53589 2005 Aero Blue Limited coupe #56109 |
Re: compare xfire performance to other cars, you'll be surprise
Yep...and I love 'em both! :D
|
Re: compare xfire performance to other cars, you'll be surprise
Originally Posted by radmanly
I'm completely satisfied with the performance of both of my cars. The Limited runs about as well as an RX-8 and the SRT is comparable to a Porsche Cayman. The Crossfire looks better than both. Sure, there are faster cars out there but aren't there always?
Dh |
Re: compare xfire performance to other cars, you'll be surprise
To me, the Cayman just looks like yet another 911 variant. It doesn't look bad. It's just...common. The Crossfire is much more distinctive.
|
Re: compare xfire performance to other cars, you'll be surprise
Originally Posted by ppro
I think my point was missed. Point was for $15K here's a car that performs well and looks good. By todays standards you would pay more for a good 308 and personally I don't think it's as good looking.
The point I was making was that the car is a relative bargain (for me anyway), holds it's own very well in looks and relative performance. The data is all subjective. I wonder if anyone is getting a stock N/A from zero to 60 in 6.4 seconds? I've never even tried. For me it's not about drag racing performance, its about the overall package. Except for the iconic styling of the Jag I used to have, I'd take the Crossfire over it in ever other way. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:11 AM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands