CrossfireForum - The Chrysler Crossfire and SRT6 Resource

CrossfireForum - The Chrysler Crossfire and SRT6 Resource (https://www.crossfireforum.org/forum/)
-   Crossfire SRT6 (https://www.crossfireforum.org/forum/crossfire-srt6/)
-   -   Taking up on MrMiata's/Latemodel's Intake Design... (https://www.crossfireforum.org/forum/crossfire-srt6/61720-taking-up-mrmiatas-latemodels-intake-design.html)

Billy22Bob Jun 8, 2013 03:48 PM

Taking up on MrMiata's/Latemodel's Intake Design...
 

Originally Posted by Mrmiata (Post 743103)
Couldn't see the price of "devil horns" myself..so I made up my own scoops. Running filters under the hood into the stock air box didn't hurt my temps any and I'm now pulling air in through 2 3" tubes. "Expect" intake air temps to come down when I remove the OEM cover and replace with a "y" setup.
Ironically - was test fitting pipes from Ebay and bought one.. then a week later the other side. Temps were lower by 10-15 degrees running the drivers side cone and OEM setup on the passenger side.. (N/A Crossfire). About all I can figure is the cone was the primary air flow and kept that side of the air box from heat soaking - keeping temps down.


https://www.crossfireforum.org/forum...coop-83846.jpg

https://www.crossfireforum.org/forum...0289-84004.jpg

On the topic of getting as much velocity pressure (air speed) in the air box as possible...
I'm wondering....if you can punch these even further forward and through the grill (a 2nd hand one maybe) in some elegant way.
I'm talking to fabtech re their setup ATM
FTP Performance Mercedes Benz AMG Cold AIR Intake System CL55 E55 SL55 S55 CLS55 | eBay

oledoc2u Jun 8, 2013 05:15 PM

Re: Taking up on MrMiata's/Latemodel's Intake Design.....
 
I really don't see any benefit from this....I have ran open tubes and with filters with no change....

Mrmiata Jun 8, 2013 09:00 PM

Re: Taking up on MrMiata's/Latemodel's Intake Design.....
 
I turned up my hearing aid.. and it sounds awesome under the hood now! :p

So you see no advantage to having two 3" tubes sucking in air (same operating air intake temps as an OEM setup per Torque Pro) vrs the OEM and restricted from the start?

MX5racer Jun 9, 2013 07:15 AM

Re: Taking up on MrMiata's/Latemodel's Intake Design.....
 
Nope, unless you were creating vacuum under wot in the air boxes which wouldn't be the case even in the SRT. Factory airboxes on some cars do run into that problem, my old S60R ran into that issue after bolt-ons and extra 8lbs of boost over stock, a vendor sold a kit that put an extra hole/intake route in the stock airbox that normalized the pressure at wot and gave or I guess returned about 14whp back toward the redline.. getting the same kit on a stock s60r netted 0hp gains even though it could breathe so much better. (same intake temps as well)

Billy22Bob Jun 9, 2013 04:39 PM

Re: Taking up on MrMiata's/Latemodel's Intake Design.....
 
I did a quick search for info -
Found a guy who had done some "rigorous" testing in his Miata (coincidently) and compared different filters by hooking up a differential pressure gauge to his inlet manifold.
Now I'm not sure this is a sound as NW_Rob's flow v 15"WG testing of airboxes, but indicative to say the least....
This guy found his stock air box without a filter to even burn off -5"WG at 6500rpm even without a filter.

Other testing (I've subtracted the 5"WG)...
K&N..................-1.3"WG
Paper................-1.8"WG
RacingBeatFoam...-1.5"WG

1psi = 27"WG

So in summary the filter steals about 0.06psi.
I'm very suprised
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To put that into perspective, NW_Robs data at 15"WG for various DCAI and CAI and stock intakes etc. when normalised out to our WOT 6000rpm 90%VE and a 65mm pulley show....
Setup......cfm......airbox......ManiP......rwhp
DCAI......706.....-13"WG.....19.2psi.....330
CAI........702.....-19"WG.....19.0psi.....328
Stock......689.....-36"WG.....18.4psi.....322
So there's obviously a lot more drop in our situation than for the miata's

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Scoops.......
there's a good intro to scoops...here....
Race Car Book
in summary they produce the equation.....
vehicle MPH = engine CFM x 1.64 / scoop area (square inches)
which is the balance point where the scoop goes from being negative prs to positive prs 'cause its capturing more air than the engine can use.
You'd want this around 55mph hey...so at WOT (700cfm) and 55mph the scoop area should be 20 in2

Having said that....
I found this here
The formula for theoretical maximum ram pressure ('velocity head') is:
p = pv²/288g, where
p is the velocity head in psi
Þ is air density in lb./cu. ft.
v is velocity in ft/sec. (88 ft./sec. = 60 mph)
g is acceleration due to gravity, 32.2 ft./sec/sec. on our home planet
So for example, at 150 mph (220 ft./sec.):
p = (0.076 x 220²)/(288 x 32.2) = 0.4 psi (~11 " H2O), or about a 2.7% potential power increase

but when you take that back 50mph.....
you get 0.04psi....so not very much until you're over 100mph (0.2psi) or a coupl'a rwhp

Mrmiata Jun 9, 2013 04:45 PM

Re: Taking up on MrMiata's/Latemodel's Intake Design.....
 
And here I thought I was just grabbing a little more cooler outside air to feed the beast.. ;)

onehundred80 Jun 9, 2013 04:52 PM

Re: Taking up on MrMiata's/Latemodel's Intake Design.....
 
Ram air has been chewed over a lot on this forum. See this thread and read the PDF in the first post.
Ram Air, Fact or Fiction.

dinasrt Jun 9, 2013 06:22 PM

Re: Taking up on MrMiata's/Latemodel's Intake Design.....
 

Originally Posted by Billy22Bob (Post 743394)
I did a quick search for info -
Found a guy who had done some "rigorous" testing in his Miata (coincidently) and compared different filters by hooking up a differential pressure gauge to his inlet manifold.
Now I'm not sure this is a sound as NW_Rob's flow v 15"WG testing of airboxes, but indicative to say the least....
This guy found his stock air box without a filter to even burn off -5"WG at 6500rpm even without a filter.

Other testing (I've subtracted the 5"WG)...
K&N..................-1.3"WG
Paper................-1.8"WG
RacingBeatFoam...-1.5"WG

1psi = 27"WG

So in summary the filter steals about 0.06psi.
I'm very suprised
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To put that into perspective, NW_Robs data at 15"WG for various DCAI and CAI and stock intakes etc. when normalised out to our WOT 6000rpm 90%VE and a 65mm pulley show....
Setup......cfm......airbox......ManiP......rwhp
DCAI......706.....-13"WG.....19.2psi.....330
CAI........702.....-19"WG.....19.0psi.....328
Stock......689.....-36"WG.....18.4psi.....322
So there's obviously a lot more drop in our situation than for the miata's

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Scoops.......
there's a good intro to scoops...here....
Race Car Book
in summary they produce the equation.....
vehicle MPH = engine CFM x 1.64 / scoop area (square inches)
which is the balance point where the scoop goes from being negative prs to positive prs 'cause its capturing more air than the engine can use.
You'd want this around 55mph hey...so at WOT (700cfm) and 55mph the scoop area should be 20 in2

Having said that....
I found this here
The formula for theoretical maximum ram pressure ('velocity head') is:
p = pv²/288g, where
p is the velocity head in psi
Þ is air density in lb./cu. ft.
v is velocity in ft/sec. (88 ft./sec. = 60 mph)
g is acceleration due to gravity, 32.2 ft./sec/sec. on our home planet
So for example, at 150 mph (220 ft./sec.):
p = (0.076 x 220²)/(288 x 32.2) = 0.4 psi (~11 " H2O), or about a 2.7% potential power increase

but when you take that back 50mph.....
you get 0.04psi....so not very much until you're over 100mph (0.2psi) or a coupl'a rwhp

Is it at all possible that you're overthinking all of this? Not sure who you're posting all these facts and figures for; I certainly know it's not the majority of us. mca=b (more cool air=better) :p

Billy22Bob Jun 9, 2013 07:27 PM

Re: Taking up on MrMiata's/Latemodel's Intake Design.....
 

Originally Posted by onehundred80 (Post 743401)
Ram air has been chewed over a lot on this forum. See this thread and read the PDF in the first post.
Ram Air, Fact or Fiction.

180...Very interesting, as Woody says - question everything.

dinasrt....apologies, but I've never been considered "in the majority" - in case you hadnt already guessed.;)

dinasrt Jun 10, 2013 12:29 AM

Re: Taking up on MrMiata's/Latemodel's Intake Design.....
 
dinasrt....apologies, but I've never been considered "in the majority" - in case you hadnt already guessed.;)[/QUOTE]

Don't worry, I'm sure that most MB owners feel the same way as you.;)

Billy22Bob Jun 10, 2013 03:27 AM

Re: Taking up on MrMiata's/Latemodel's Intake Design...
 
bada bing!:D

Billy22Bob Jun 18, 2013 04:07 PM

Re: Taking up on MrMiata's/Latemodel's Intake Design...
 
1 Attachment(s)
came across this....

another variant

Mrmiata Jun 18, 2013 04:12 PM

Re: Taking up on MrMiata's/Latemodel's Intake Design...
 

Originally Posted by Billy22Bob (Post 744779)
came across this....

another variant

I like the price of mine..:D So I won't even ask.. lol.

BrianBrave Jun 19, 2013 01:07 AM

Re: Taking up on MrMiata's/Latemodel's Intake Design...
 

Originally Posted by Mrmiata (Post 744780)
I like the price of mine..:D So I won't even ask.. lol.

Diddo !!

https://www.crossfireforum.org/galle...e_opening1.jpg


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:41 PM.


© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands