Originally Posted by golfdude
Indeed everyone has put some good comments. If the SRT-6 was stick, this thread would not have been started. It's cheaper, better looking, and faster in a straight line. Please everyone keep in mind with just a few miles on the Cayman S, the $70,000 shocker pricing turns into a more reasonable $53,000.
53 is still unreasonable.. because as i said srt can be had for 27, 28 new. So far of all the cars you guys mentioned i see none that are better that the crossfire, except for the 911 turbo but then again it costs umm... more than 4 times what crossfire costs and for that price their are cars I would take over it as well.
Crossfire was never meant to be a 27k car it was meant to be a 50k car, but it just didn't work out... and yes it has the worth of a 50k car, but you are just getting it at a greatly reduced price...
Also it is funny how people sometimes compare the crossfire to cars like 350z, sky redline, g35, s2000, solstice gxp when all of them are nowhere near it's range... the cars that crossfire can and should be compared to are Z4 M, M3, SLK55 AMG (Yes it is better than crossfire
), the porsche, and other similar cars which i can't think of.
I see no reason at all to spend double the price to get something which isn't even better than the SRT...