Thread: motherf
View Single Post
Old Apr 4, 2004 | 06:47 PM
  #21 (permalink)  
Ronman's Avatar
Ronman
Forum Regular
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 772
Likes: 94
Default

Originally Posted by AZ Outlaws
Ronman wrote: "... I'm not an attorney but I believe that the owner of the mall could be potentially liable to what happened to your car". then you turn around in the very next post to say "...Grocery stores are liable for shopping cart damage, for sure, without a doubt".

Yo Bro,

Don't get your shorts in a knot!!!

I merely asked, "...where are you getting that information from???" Go back and read both of your post's, they contradict each other!!! One minute you only "believe" and in the second "you state a fact" that they are liable. That was a quick change of info on your part. So which one is it????

BTW: If you can't handle people disagreeing with you, or making comments, I wouldn't do much posting here... 'cause everyone is not going to agree and they will ask questions if there is any doubt in what you say.

Have a great day... :roll: :roll: :roll:

First post said that grocery stores are liable and second post said the same thing. I just don't know if the mall would be liable since it had nothing to do with a shopping cart but with some jerk involved. Grocery stores are liable by law. One time a friend parked at the end of the Sam's Club lot after his blazer had just been painted. When he got to his car, some guy had let a shopping cart fly down the hill at his car. Sam's Club tried to get out of it but when my friend quoted the law, they took his name down and corporate headquarters took it from there and paid for the damage. My attorney has even confirmed they are liable. Make sense now?? I reread both of my posts and I don't see where the confusion is.
 
Reply