Originally Posted by Sidez
Well that sure is definatly an argument if you classify what a car is by vin than sure..
But in my oppinion a car is not a name, not a badge, not the seller, and most certainly not some legal information number (vin). A car is defined for me by those that built the car, those that designed the parts used for the car,.. and these people call themselves Mercedes-Benz, Karmann, or in some cases AMG... might even throw Bosch and some others in there, but definatly not Chrysler...
what has chrysler acctually done for the car someone enlighten me please?... all they did as far as I know is sell someone elses product with their stickers on them... it is like me buying a pack a malboros and putting a Sidez sticker on it claiming it is a Sidez product... imagine going to a store like Target and seeing every product in there ie. sony cameras, panasonic tvs all rebadged to "Target".. would not make much sense would it... cause all target is.. is a middleman for those companies... the same applies here..
Sidez, its a really great car, but its still a Chrysler. It may have been built overseas but the fact remains that it was conceived as a Chrysler product and will always remain so. If in your mind you want to pretend its a Mercedes-Benz, go ahead. But in my opinion its kind of like putting lipstick on a pig.
Look at my original post: Accept it for what it is, drive it, and enjoy it. The Crossfire is a great car!