View Single Post
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 06:28 PM
  #12 (permalink)  
parawxman's Avatar
parawxman
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Default Re: Removing the Catalytic Converter

I wouldn't advocate information like this to one of the forum members, that doesn't present the implications of getting caught without one and the actual no BS performance results. Again, benefits would be minimal, espeically on the NA car. Your self fulfilling prophesy of superior gas mileage isn't an objective emphirical test and doesn't mean much to me, sorry. Not with-standing an increase in gas mileage, still doesn't reveal that these were properly functioning CATs when removed. In the mid 70's and 80's dumping the CAT's did work for performance, and the inspection for these wasn't strict. Many states, now look for cut outs, not just the presence of the CAT. Look up the penaltys before you advocate to young guys that they need to chop them out for a net gain of NIL. The states are only going to become MORE restrictive about emmisions checking, not less.

The after market CATs made by Random Technology are the way that professional shops go, especially with sensitive OBD2 cars. They are large and free flowing and don't cost much money. That's my advice to give if guys must do something with their CATs, but when you are talking about a 220 hp car, the minimal results don't outway the negative aspects of removing them.



Originally Posted by Maxwell
BS..oem are still restrictive, and aftermarket cats will set off your warning light beacuse they do flow better, but not that efficient at cleaning the unburned gases.

I have monolythic cats on my Silverado, took them off and gained 2 mpg. so you can't tell me the monolythics are non-restrictive. this is worth the cost of materials, if you added up your fuel bill before and after for the year especially at $3.80-$4.00 per gallon, 2MPG adds up, so it's all gain, even if you make 5 extra hp.
 
Reply