Old Aug 10, 2004 | 07:28 PM
  #1 (permalink)  
golfdude's Avatar
golfdude
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 816
Likes: 4
Default I would rather prefer the interior of my Crossfire

Yes, the Crossfire SRT-6 is quick. Yes, it is $45,000. But no, I really don't like the interior of the car. It seems so bland. I've sat in one, the seats keep you planted with the suede inserts, but overall, I really think the interior looks cheaper than my $34,000 Crossfire with Cedar/black colors. The SRT-6 just looks so dark and boring on the inside with the plain black inside. When I first got my Crossfire, I always smiled at night when I opened the door and the interior lights revealed a refreshing aray of unique colors of leather. The SRT-6, in my opinion, should offer a variety of different interior colors, like that creamy white of the Convertible version, with suede inserts of course. And when you compare the interiors of the SRT-6 and the SLK32, it seems rediculous. The SLK32 gets special stitching, unique gauges, and a special wood trim package (not to mention the ability to custom-order the car to your color specs, inside and out). The SRT-6, on the other hand, gets boring looking seats, and a 200 m.p.h. speedo that looks exactly like the regular Crossfire's speedo. And to top that off, it comes in boring black. If I am spending $11,000 more on a car, I expect it to have a better looking interior, regardless of how much faster it is. At this price, I would rather get a $31,000 Subaru WRX STI and leave the $15,000 to engine and suspension mods! With this kind of Subaru, the SRT-6 would have no chance of winning, in any weather, except maybe in an extremely tight autocross track.
 
Reply