Originally Posted by sonoronos
I guess I just can't believe that the S2000 is a whole second faster in the quarter mile than the XF. It doesn't make much sense to me. Maybe it's a combination of the 18 extra horses and the 200 lb reduction in weight?
Maybe it's the 13.9 quarter mile time on the S2000 that makes the XF stat look so wrong
Yeah, that 13.9 number seems mildly optimistic. Maybe I'm off base on that, but I'm surprised such a torqueless wonder can pull that kind of time, even with its light weight.