Originally Posted by VegasCrossfire
Good questions AZ - but you asked for it!!!

But to answer your questions - because they are
TROLLS and they are
RUDE :!:
Trolls? Why? Because we post the truth to clear out the BS? Im sorry, but there's no way a Crossfire is even close to a Z in terms of performance. Think about it... 287HP vs what? A measly 210HP? Both cars weigh nearly the same. It's pretty much common sense as to which one is faster.
As for the looks argument, Z wins once again hands down. My sister saw a crossfire on the road the other day (maroon type color) and made a comment on how ugly it looked. I tried to convince her that it looks decent, but she disagreed.
Do you actually think the Z doesn't get looks? My friend gets nothing but compliments and "nice car!" remarks from girls just walking down the street... it's insane. I'm sure you guys get compliments, too. But you need to realize that your cars are not the only ones that get compliments.
As for the Mach1 guy, yes the Mach 1 is a more strip capable car. Best handling solid rear axle? The Z will wipe the floor with the Mach1 on a road course, sorry. LS1 F-Bodies, stock vs. stock, like it or not, are faster than Mach 1s. You probably ran into some bad drivers. There's stock F-Bodies that trap 109-110 in the 1/4 mile. Best trap speed for a Mach 1 I've ever heard of was a 106.
And why not choose a Cobra over a Z? Maybe it's because of the horrid build quality. Maybe it's because there's millions of mustangs on the roads already. Maybe they actually want something that can handle. There's reasons like that and many more. Why not choose a Cobra over your Mach 1?