Originally Posted by XFireKilla
Originally Posted by VegasCrossfire
Good questions AZ - but you asked for it!!!
But to answer your questions - because they are
TROLLS and they are
RUDE :!:
Trolls? Why? Because we post the truth to clear out the BS? Im sorry, but there's no way a Crossfire is even close to a Z in terms of performance. Think about it... 287HP vs what? A measly 210HP? Both <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=cars&v=56">cars</a> weigh nearly the same. It's pretty much common sense as to which one is faster.
As for the looks argument, Z wins once again hands down. My sister saw a crossfire on the road the other day (maroon type color) and made a comment on how ugly it looked. I tried to convince her that it looks decent, but she disagreed.
Do you actually think the Z doesn't get looks? My friend gets nothing but compliments and "nice car!" remarks from girls just walking down the street... it's insane. I'm sure you guys get compliments, too. But you need to realize that your <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=cars&v=56">cars</a> are not the only ones that get compliments.
As for the Mach1 guy, yes the Mach 1 is a more strip capable <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=car&v=56">car</a>. Best handling solid rear axle? The Z will wipe the floor with the Mach1 on a road course, sorry. LS1 F-Bodies, <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=stock&v=56">stock</a> vs. <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=stock&v=56">stock</a>, like it or not, are faster than Mach 1s. You probably ran into some bad drivers. There's <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=stock&v=56">stock</a> F-Bodies that trap 109-110 in the 1/4 mile. Best trap speed for a Mach 1 I've ever heard of was a 106.
And why not choose a Cobra over a Z? Maybe it's because of the horrid build quality. Maybe it's because there's millions of mustangs on the roads already. Maybe they actually want something that can handle. There's reasons like that and many more. Why not choose a Cobra over your Mach 1?
you 350z guys crack me up LOL. I'm sure ya love to read magazines so in Hot Tin Roofs from car and Driver they compared The mach 1 vs the 350z vs s2000 vs a pos TT. The live axle mach placed 2nd to your 350z. But straight line performance wanst even close but the mach was only 1mph slower avg lap speed "a track with twisties" Not bad for a liveaxle caron the god awful goodyeargator backs, some of the worse tires ever made. They said after a fewlaps they were already cupped. Put some grippery rubber on the mach 1 and it may have been a different out come.
Not to impressive on the z's part since it was 4kmore expensive and already had good rubber. I trapped my bone stock mach 1 at over 107 and pulled a 13.2 down the 1320. go to mach1registry forum. This is not uncommon. ALot of guys did better thani did stock. Richard wilson ran a 12.89@109 bone stock. You guys need forced induction to get there lol. :lol: And yes my hawk did trap higher than my mach but, there is more to drag racing than trap speed its called gearing and the machs gearing is better than the f-body. So as i said before the 350z does not I repeat does not impress me. Don't be mad cuz I spanked one of your slow brotheren. He even had a head start. :lol: