View Single Post
Old Jan 29, 2009 | 06:00 PM
  #11 (permalink)  
Rob M's Avatar
Rob M
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 862
Likes: 5
From: Maryland
Default Re: MPG vs W/S (auto) & 2nd in 6spd?

historically, the additional weight of automatic transmissions and efficiency losses through clutches resulted in automatics getting less fuel economy than manual transmissions. the crossfire with autostick weighs just 24 or so lbs more than the 6-spd and it has a lockup torque converter that eliminates the losses experienced through the clutches while at cruising speed. the autostick transmission programming should result in more efficient shift points than the average 6-spd driver which explains the higher fuel efficiency ratings of the auto. Then again it might have more to do with how the EPA tests the vehicles. Anyone ever look at the test profiles? Who drives up to 56 mph in the city, but never exceeds 60 on the highway?
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/fe_test_schedules.shtml

i would guess that there would be a minimal increase in mpg by accelerating conservatively in "W" or 2nd.
 

Last edited by Rob M; Jan 29, 2009 at 06:10 PM.
Reply