Originally Posted by slk32krazy!
im not seeing how the supercooler is impedeing flow. the is a space between the 2 radiaitors and flow is good. as for cooling capacity the oem h/e was so small it couldnt hold much more than a qt or so.
my oem overflow is only used for the engine now as the h/e runs so cool no overflow is needed.
woody does rob have the 180 tstat? i know you run 1 and im thinking that will help. the temps ran just undr 100 degrees C on a trip of 120 miles. had some blasts up to 130 mph and more than a couple smokey burnouts. never went higher and during the evening dropped to just above the 80 mark.
even sitting in traffic the temp doesnt go above 100. i would just like to see the temp around 80 C
I have a super cooler and iso system, I also had a LET H/E and obviously a OEM H/E.
The same amount of air flow is NOT reaching the radiator with a super cooler, compared to a LET or OEM H/E. I'm not saying the air flow is bad, just stating air flow is slightly reduced with a super cooler in the original path of the radiator. This slight reduction in air flow translates to a slight increase in engine temps, 2-4 F over LET/ OEM. The super cooler pros out weigh the slight increase in engine temps, no question.
Thats my 411
.