View Single Post
Old Aug 3, 2009 | 09:11 AM
  #27 (permalink)  
32krazy!'s Avatar
32krazy!
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 4
From: murfreesboro,tn
Default Re: Which looks better?

Originally Posted by JHM2K
Actually, it has been determined that the horsepower deficit is only present on the dealership brochures, because once they;re both strapped to a dyno, the cars yield the same power. Ask the fellas at TVT, Eurocharged, etc... the consensus is that the SRT was advertised with less HP as a courtesy to MB. Also, it's my understanding that the X-fire is lighter, and I know for a fact that the torsional rigidity/handling is superior.

Does it all really matter? Not to me. If someone installed Kleemann parts on their SRT and wanted to put on a Kleemann badge, go for it. Steve Hellums had Renntech tuning on his if I'm not mistaken. Basically, if a car is branded with an emblem and it hass the ***** and legitimacy to back it up, I have no issues.

After all, Carl is simply putting a badge on, not altering the car's title. He isn't swapping VINs. It's basically an outward testemonial of the inside guts of the car. I wouldn't take offense to it. We're all here for the greater cause.
i think you fail to see the difference. kleeman brabus are outside companies that upgrade the car much like ligenfelter does to the vette
amg is a part of m/b.
there are many things you can do to the srt-6 to make it unique. to attempt to ask the masses to accept it as an amg auto isnt one of them.
i guess at this point its time to agree that we will never agree!
 
Reply