View Single Post
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 10:50 AM
  #5 (permalink)  
ZAHANMA's Avatar
ZAHANMA
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,535
Likes: 3
From: Houston in my blood, and under my tires...
Default Re: 2.29 seconds 60' time

Originally Posted by billvp
That would be a 12.6ish with a good 60' time I imagine, not a 2.29.
I understand that, I was more inferring that the whole table may be off a bit...If you actually did get a 2.29 60', and that is 100% accurate, then you are looking at a 13.2 or slower...I was just going off the fact you said you didn't have much spin.
 
Reply