Well, I think you are the entire person in the entire world who believes what you do about the ford modular engine. I even referred to you the web site to back up my explanation, but as with the dyno sheet, you simply disregarded evidence which didn't fit in with your belief.

As for "real" dyno sheets, your theory is ridiculous. There is simply no standardized method for reporting diagnostic information. My hunch is that you received a sheet like that and, consistant with your personality, you assumed that your sheet is the "right" sheet. Consider - the Mazda RX-8 has a redline at 9,000 RPMs. Being a rotary engine, it is able to maintain a smooth torque-curve all the way to 9k rpms, with most of the power coming in that top range. So you're telling me that a "real" dyno would completely discount 1/3 of a car's torque curve - in the case of the RX-8, the 1/3 with the most power? If that was the case, it would be impossible to dyno the RX-8, or any other car with a red line above 6k, correct? I understand you feel that I'm a complete moron, so perhaps you could show me what part of my logic is flawed? Of course, you won't be able to do that, because I'm right . And, unlike you, I actually go to facts and resources to back up my claims, so for your convenience I have attached three different dyno sheets for your (and those with more credibility) perusal (normally I would just post links, but you were too lazy or scared to follow the link to the ford webs site, so maybe shoving the evidence in your face will work). Notice that not one of these dynos goes only up to 6,000 RPM. Some go above, and some go below. In fact, if you type dyno into google you can view several companies which make diagnostic tools. Everyone which I visited said that you could specify an RPM range.

I'm going to invent a new catch-phrase for the act of dis-prooving someone's idiotic claims wrong when backed up by overwhemling, irrefutable evidence:
You've been hobbydiked!