Thread: 350z
View Single Post
Old May 2, 2005 | 10:34 PM
  #21 (permalink)  
OutOvTuch's Avatar
OutOvTuch
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default Re: 350z

Originally Posted by Bullseye
Uglier sports car= 1974-1982 Chevy Corvette to name one.

And about the M5 on the highway, if you stood a remote chance in hell against the M5, which you didn't, you would have tried. So........ you are the guy in the left lane doing 50?


Well you are right about the SRT-4 take the 350Z, and that's why I now own one.

But the 350z not only takes the crossfire 0-60, it takes in the 1/4 mile and in the top end. Brakes just as good, 60-0 in 113ft as the crossfire. And the 350Z slaloms faster and pulls more G's according to MT. I am sure you can find some better figures, but these are here in front of me.

And I guess you can beat a crossfire for 26k, that's why the 350z outsells the crossfire by alot. people judge a sports car, well if you want to call the crossfire one is being nice, by performance, and the 350z outshines the Crossfire. And base 350z can be had for 24,900. Not bad for brand new. Or you could max yourself out and buy the anniversary edition for around 33k, if that floats your boat.

And our crossfire have gremlins of there own. Don't forget the manual console can act as if it were snakes in a can.

Bullseye, bro, don't hate on people who actually own Crossfires. I'll be sure to say what's up to you when I see you rolling in your 1990 Honda Civic.
 
Reply