Thread: Trans fluid type revisited
View Single Post
Old Sep 3, 2011 | 09:26 PM
  #3 (permalink)  
James1549's Avatar
James1549
Senior Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 10,460
Likes: 159
From: Cincinnati ( Delhi )
Default Re: Trans fluid type revisited
Howard, I do recall those numbers you posted and thanks . But am I correct in assuming that 236.2 supersedes the numbers 236.1x you posted?
 
Reply
0