I find this group very helpful in diagnosing issues and such, but as all open forums, that valuable information is laced with "it is right" vs "it is wrong" discussions...everything becomes a toss up.

I give cudos to those here that are pushing these cars to their limits on the track (and sometimes on the road) to see what works and what does not. However, as those that test and tune away seek ever faster SRT6s there is a big difference between these cars and the solutions being employed and the normal daily driven vehicle.

So with that said, what do you guys think of setting some standard for posting issues/upgrades/tests so that everyone is able to identify if this new mod is ready for prime time or not. What I am suggesting here is that if someone is trying out a new part number that they indicate the old part number and replacement part number, identify if the car is a daily driver (+miles per week) or a track car (how often do they run a month), and report on durability 30/60/90 days out from the change over. If this mod is related to tuning indicate improvements to performance, 90 day check back on any issues related to changes, and if the car is a daily road car (+ miled driven per week) or a track car (how much track time is being seen by the car per month).

I ask because we could then start related threads that everyone could post under that would provide a single location for issues and give everyone a better sense of real world use, applications, and how well these changes hold up over time. Not to mention a great section for owners years from now to search when parts become sparse, models updated, and solid advancements from hours of track time by the DIY engineers here on the forum.