View Single Post
Old Aug 24, 2012 | 05:41 PM
  #10 (permalink)  
Franc Rauscher's Avatar
Franc Rauscher
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,500
Likes: 1,126
From: St Louis MO
Default Re: SRT vs standard Roadster

I have oneof each. The only thing imiss in the SRT over the Limited,is the ability to row my own gers.

A disapointment that does not go lightly but, fades somewhat as Iwatch other cars get tiny in the rear view mirror.

I can actualy visualize living without the manual tranny.

The pressure onmy @ss from thesupercharged power plant in the SRT, I cannot.

As for operating costs, the SRT has not really cost more than the NA. Mostly because I push the NA to the limit everytime I drive it. I have poured a ton of money into the NA to achieve,,,,,,,295 HP at the crank.

The SRT, at 330 HP stock, is just getting started where the Limited leaves off.

The wife and I are downsizing to one car. It will be the SRT. Folks who know me as the "Roadster with a Stick" will attest, this is gonna be hard for me. But,the SRT is the collectable, and the one worth maintaining .

So,if you can find one you like, I suggest as a "keeper' the SRT is where you should head.
 

Last edited by Franc Rauscher; Aug 24, 2012 at 05:44 PM.
Reply