Thread: I am looking for an argument
View Single Post
Old Oct 29, 2012 | 04:16 PM
  #6 (permalink)  
waldig's Avatar
waldig
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,508
Likes: 34
From: VA
Talking Re: Iam looking for an argument
180, note the inlet and outlet are are at opposite diagonal corners. I have a solution to the flow rates balance issue.

The 1/9th restriction would promote more flow and 2: 1 is a good estimate, I concur with you on that one.

With Twice the flow and greater temperature differentials, it feels like this could be better than factory cooling, I.E. lower IATs. [ given the massive increase in pump and h/e sizes].

The path restriction-friction would be 1/9 the stock restriction and about 3 times the cross section and maybe twice the flow, should be non turbulent due to the lower rate of flow per channel. BAD MATH WARNING; 2x flow, divided among 3x tubes =about 2/3 rate of flow or 3/2 as much latency time = = better heat up take.

I really dont want laminar flow, need to scrub off the boundry layer / film layer. Rather be in the goldie locks region somewhere in the middle.

OVER.
 
Reply
0