I just received my insurance bill in the mail today. It seems that it costs me $48.00 less per year to insure our "04" 6 spd. Crossfire, than it does to insure our "04" Honda Civic EX automatic coupe.
Now I'm pretty sure the XF stickered out for nearly twice as much as the Civic. I would presume, part for part, the Crossfire would be more expensive to repair. Even as bad as the resale is on the Crossfire, I'm sure the Honda is less. So I wonder why the Honda still cost more to insure? (Maybe it's because more Hondas are stolen than Crossfires.)