View Single Post
Old Mar 23, 2015 | 12:41 AM
  #8 (permalink)  
nickwe21's Avatar
nickwe21
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 174
Default Re: The real performance of Crossfire/SLK320

Originally Posted by oledoc2u
SRT6 motor is the same amg motor they put in their 32.... exactly the same according to shipping records I found to the Karmann factory. They rated that motor 349 hp. So the gains stated based on 330 hp are what are wrong. We are starting with 349... That is the advertising that was falsified to keep MB happy.
Makes a lot of sense. So in turn I would assume the engine used in the SLK 320 NA is the same as the Crossfire NA. It is what I was getting at but would love to know real output. I have hear people saying the 320 engine in the Crossfire has an output of around 255 PS!
This leads me to another question...since the Xfire is lighter than its MB counterpart, should the performance output in regards to track times not be better as well?
Is it safe to say the Crossfire was superior to the SLK??? I sure still am fascinated by the looks of Crossfire's...can keep up with any performance vehicle in its original price segment today as far as looks are concerned. This I can't say about the SLK that just looks dated!!
 
Reply