Not a fan of the video. It just seems like these guys misunderstand the video, have wrong expectations or just simply are too lazy to do their homework.
He does write in the comment section that after driving it for a while the car grew on him.
Comment section is full of negative comments, too calling it cheap and "Chrysler quality", which means bound to fall apart.

It amazes me that it's brother, the Mercedes SLK always received the highest praise and the Crossfire was just a piece of junk. Really interesting what a different emblem does to the thought process of people.

​​​​​​I get it, at the time of the Crossfire and before the Chrysler lineup wasn't the most sophisticated and stellar of all line ups and the old Plymouth, Neons and even Town and Countries didn't last last 100,000 miles without major damage but still...

​​​​​​AND then he compares it to his much better and much more beloved vehicle ...that ugly ugly Hyundai. 😂 Oh well, different strokes for different folks I guess!