Crossfire Coupe A place to discuss Coupe specific topics.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

AutoStick - a true a manual in disguise?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 02:21 PM
  #1 (permalink)  
XFire-Amore's Avatar
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: East Lansing, MI
Default AutoStick - a true a manual in disguise?

Question is this just another chrysler autostick or is it something like an SMG (sequential manual gearbox) where when you shift the computer cannot override your shift, even if it is bad for the transmission or engine; thereby making it a real manual when in autostick mode.

Becuase I have realized that even if i try to start in 1st gear with the autostick the car will remain in 1st gear until I shift up, thereby essentially turning the car into a clutchless manual. Most cars with auto sticks, is just a toy that is completely controlled by the cars' ECM similar to the Porsche Tiptronic which is a farse.
 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 03:06 PM
  #2 (permalink)  
Dave___in___CT's Avatar
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: West-central Connecticut
Default

Hi...


The Crossfire's automatic transmission WILL upshift on it's own when the redline is hit... regardless of what gear you selected...

It also will not downshift into a gear you select that would cause the redline to be exceeded... it downshifts into the gear that does not cause redlining...

I understand this is controlled by valving in the transmission... not a computer...


Dave...
 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 03:22 PM
  #3 (permalink)  
mcredelle's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

even my tiptronic eclipse only downshifts for me if it'll stall the engine if i don't downshift and won't let me if i'm going to exceed redline, i think thats pretty common, it never upshifts for me but if i hit redline in 1st gear it just cuts the fuel so i can't go any higher, but i can go past redline in second.
 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 08:46 PM
  #4 (permalink)  
Dan Root's Avatar
Banned
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,205
Likes: 1
From: port hueneme ca.
Default

IT's a Mercedes 5 speed auto not Chrysler!Biiiiiiiiiggggggg difference!
 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 11:49 PM
  #5 (permalink)  
drunkiq's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Default

The "autostick" that the crossfire comes with is a true automatic transmission. This does not work as well as a tiptronic and no where like a sequential gearbox and definely not like anything like a Ricardo 7 speed, double wet-clutch transmission (shifts gears in 200 miliseconds).

When you hit the plus or minus there is a short delay before the shift. It even managed to shift on me in a low torque situation durning my test drive (wonder if it reverts to automode if there is not manual change over a given time).... It is the same as having a D 4 3 2 L but has a fancy +/-

It is much easier then trying to force your tranny into the traditional 4 3 2 L but shifts just as slow. It does allow you to have some more control over the shift points which would be good in some situations like autocrossing.
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 02:15 AM
  #6 (permalink)  
saldous's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
From: Berkshire, UK
Default

I actually think it shifts quite quick. I've had a number of automatic cars in the past, including an Audi A6, Mercedes CLK, Rover 800 and Ford Mondeo. The shift on the XFire is much quicker than all of these cars. Yes, it isn't perfect, autos never will be, but it is a lot better than others.
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 03:32 PM
  #7 (permalink)  
XFire-Amore's Avatar
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: East Lansing, MI
Default

yeah, i've realized that the AS does have that lag time in it b/w shifts. so i change my regular opinion to shotty manual imitation instead.
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 09:39 AM
  #8 (permalink)  
David Burns's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 1
From: Manassas, VA
Default

Originally Posted by XFire-Amore
yeah, i've realized that the AS does have that lag time in it b/w shifts. so i change my regular opinion to shotty manual imitation instead.
It is the Mercedes Touch Shift transmission. It has no resemblance to the "auto-stick" in the Pacifica or any other Chrysler vehicle other than in name.
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 01:01 PM
  #9 (permalink)  
lordpercy's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: London, England
Default

I find its a great combo of normal auto driving and then using the autostick for dropping down early when you want to gun it! I find the kickdown in full auto mode slugish so the +/- is a very useful tool.

When i drove the manual i found 1st gear way to short and the whole box very notchy, with a very light clutch too, merc don't do good manuals!
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 02:28 PM
  #10 (permalink)  
drunkiq's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by David Burns
Originally Posted by XFire-Amore
yeah, i've realized that the AS does have that lag time in it b/w shifts. so i change my regular opinion to shotty manual imitation instead.
It is the Mercedes Touch Shift transmission. It has no resemblance to the "auto-stick" in the Pacifica or any other Chrysler vehicle other than in name.
Your right it is not like the chrysler autostick approach - This reviewer complained that it did not work as good as the Chrysler approach:

Originally Posted by By Joe Wiesenfelder of cars.com

The automatic also includes clutchless-manual operation under the Chrysler name AutoStick, but itfs clearly the same as Mercedesf system, in that the lever can be moved to the left or right to downshift or upshift sequentially without sliding into a separate shift gate. Unfortunately, this mode also operates like the Mercedes feature; selecting one of the higher gears still allows the transmission to kick down to a lower gear, which has not been the Chrysler approach. AutoStick historically has kept the transmission in whatever gear you choose unless you change it or come to a complete stop. Ifm not a big fan of clutchless manuals to begin with, but it seems to me that they should be as manual as possible. The Mercedes and Crossfire systems are little more than the old g4321h gear selector settings that used to follow the D (Drive), but with a different motion to activate them.

Another twist, the driver can hold the shift lever in the left, downshift, position and the computer will automatically select the optimum gear based on the carfs speed, engine rpm and lateral g-force. Other journalists were more taken with this feature than I. Smart drivetrain control is always great to see in an automatic transmission, but this is another way that AutoStick is more Auto and less Stick.

It wonft surprise you that I preferred driving the six-speed manual. This is the transmission that in 2001 rescued the SLK from the only manual transmission Ifve ever warned consumers not to buy. In the SLK, it was a vast improvement over the catastrophic five-speed sold in 2000, but Ifll need more time to decide how I like it in the Crossfire. I prefer it to the automatic just because itfs a manual, but Ifm not sure about the gear ratios. Theyfre the same as in the SLK and C-Class, down to the final-drive ratio, but something seems amiss. Perhaps itfs the Crossfirefs larger drive wheels or the fact that I recently drove Infinitifs G35 Sport Coupe, which has a brilliantly executed six-speed.
If it can't simulate a real manual then it is an auto...
I am suprised the aftermarket guys have not come up with a way to reprogram it...
-marc
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 03:53 PM
  #11 (permalink)  
Ron H's Avatar
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Crossville, TN
Default

I've got to agree -- the Crossfire autostick is nowhere near as precise or responsive as the Chrysler autostick. I had one in my 300M. When I upshifted or downshifted there was instant response. With the Crossfire, the tranny reacts like "Oh, so you want to shift now. (pause) Well, OK, I guess we can do that (pause)." Then finally a shift. I'm not really excited about a chip upgrade for 20 or so HP, but if that upgrade changed the manual shifting to be more responsive, I'd consider the upgrade in a heartbeat.
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 04:20 PM
  #12 (permalink)  
David Burns's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 1
From: Manassas, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Ron H
I've got to agree -- the Crossfire autostick is nowhere near as precise or responsive as the Chrysler autostick. I had one in my 300M. When I upshifted or downshifted there was instant response. With the Crossfire, the tranny reacts like "Oh, so you want to shift now. (pause) Well, OK, I guess we can do that (pause)." Then finally a shift. I'm not really excited about a chip upgrade for 20 or so HP, but if that upgrade changed the manual shifting to be more responsive, I'd consider the upgrade in a heartbeat.
Well...as we discussed during the Skyline CrossUp, we need to get together. You can try my Upsolute'd Coupe, I can try your Roadster :idea: 8)
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Osusannah
Crossfire Roadster
38
Feb 12, 2024 01:49 PM
crossfireusa
Engine, Exhaust, Transmission and Differential
6
Oct 28, 2015 12:03 AM
MiamiTVR
Other Cars Etc
15
Oct 3, 2015 09:02 PM
maxcichon
All Crossfires
0
Sep 30, 2015 11:38 AM
Valk
Parts/Accessories for sale - Archive
0
Sep 17, 2015 11:43 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:48 PM.