W.o.w.
Thread Starter
|
Forum Regular
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
W.o.w.
Wow On Wows - let's see how many posts we can get titled "wow" - On second thought... NO, let's not!
Sorry guys - I just had to post this WOW - couldn't help myself.
Seriously though posts should be titled with appropriately with some relevence to their content. Now if it's something extraordinary - like an 10 or 11 sec. 1/4 mile time or a 200 mph top speed - then a wow would be appropriate; But for the most part I think we would prefer not to see another "wow" post.
hope I didn't offend anyone
Sorry guys - I just had to post this WOW - couldn't help myself.
Seriously though posts should be titled with appropriately with some relevence to their content. Now if it's something extraordinary - like an 10 or 11 sec. 1/4 mile time or a 200 mph top speed - then a wow would be appropriate; But for the most part I think we would prefer not to see another "wow" post.
hope I didn't offend anyone
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 2
From: Albuquerque, NM
Re: W.o.w.
Whenever I see one of those horrible titles, I am never dissapointed by the impressively low quality of the questions. "OMG!!! Can I get a cold air intake?" question types make me wonder if he possesses the capacity to utilize the search function.
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
From: Arizona [85255]
Re: W.o.w.
Originally Posted by RPM
OMG! WOW!
I agree, post titles should be relevant.
I agree, post titles should be relevant.
