Crossfire SRT6 A place to discuss SRT-6 specific topics.

heads and cam shaft question for max hp

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 06:18 PM
  #21 (permalink)  
MD SRT6's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Default Re: heads and cam shaft question for max hp

Originally Posted by Bulldogger
Engines are engines,which are basically air pumps the more efficient the more hp/tq they make, the crossfire is not an exception, you are more limited by by the ECU and traction controls (which probably won't be figured out at this point),along with only one other gear choice which you can get from the NA cars which is slightly different. I see you also use your car to test atmospheric pressure, Just say you use the track for a testing bed, and I don't really care that your car can beat Z06's you seem to miss the point as usual. The Dyno showed very little gain which translated to no change in track times. Supercharged cars don't respond to the head work like NA cars with the air being constantly forced in you will probably only pick up 2% more flow, and that won't change track times. But as usual since you are the self proclaimed most knowledgable, what was the difference in tract times from non ported to ported heads only?? Not including supercharger porting and gasket matching.
I'm not trying to debate you on this issue, I was just stating my personal results and disagreeing that head work is not a worthwhile mod.If you would have read my complete post you would have seen that I don't have a lot of dyno sheets as I use the track as my "barometer". And by no means am I proclaiming myself as an expert on all these issues I'm just speaking of what I got out of my modifications. By the way a tract is a measurement of land And as Forrest Gump said "That's all I've got to say about that"
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 07:21 PM
  #22 (permalink)  
Bulldogger's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 665
Likes: 1
Default Re: heads and cam shaft question for max hp

Originally Posted by MD SRT6
I'm not trying to debate you on this issue, I was just stating my personal results and disagreeing that head work is not a worthwhile mod.If you would have read my complete post you would have seen that I don't have a lot of dyno sheets as I use the track as my "barometer". And by no means am I proclaiming myself as an expert on all these issues I'm just speaking of what I got out of my modifications. By the way a tract is a measurement of land And as Forrest Gump said "That's all I've got to say about that"
I think with the 3 valves per cylinder, 2 being on the intake runners straight below the supercharger, there just isn't much to be gained. I would say you will gain some but not 2 tenths or more. I really personally doubt even a tenth. As to why you car is fastest so far, has yet to be determined. I'll have my car done for ATCO in NJ and I'll see what it actually does. My mods are a little different, LET tune and SL-55 intakes, my own modded plenums. The 181 pulley and rear cat delete exhaust are similar to yours. It will be interesting to see. Maybe I'm wrong with the head work but time will tell. A good indicator of how well the head porting worked would be seen in a drop off in boost. This would be due to illiminating restriction. I don't know if you had gauges at the time on not. I'm not here to argue with you. It is just that the new style heads today with the 3 and 4 valve set ups are pretty good out of the factory and don't really benefit like the older style heads.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
minimayhem
Engine, Exhaust, Transmission and Differential
16
Aug 23, 2016 07:47 AM
KDW4Him
Crossfire Events and Meets
15
Sep 30, 2015 08:53 PM
xjken
All Crossfires
1
Sep 6, 2015 11:37 AM
rdougc
Audio, Video and Electronics
2
Sep 5, 2015 10:30 PM
PA/XFIRE
Crossfire SRT6
1
Sep 5, 2015 01:25 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:04 PM.