Automatic transmission in a sports car!!!???
Originally Posted by cdvntx
Well this is my first Crossfire and I have put less than 300 miles on it. I hope to drive others with a manual. There seems to be many others saying the same thing. Is the manual an MB design or something off the self from Chrysler?
Actually, I shouldn't be so obsessive about the transmission, unless of course I get 2 SRTs. 1 to reward and baby and 1 to punish on the track. Ha!
I fully expected to see people mating their SRTs with manuals and more appearance mods. I'd like to do something to mine to make it a little more unique, but even changing the wheels, selections seem to be few...
Actually, I shouldn't be so obsessive about the transmission, unless of course I get 2 SRTs. 1 to reward and baby and 1 to punish on the track. Ha!
I fully expected to see people mating their SRTs with manuals and more appearance mods. I'd like to do something to mine to make it a little more unique, but even changing the wheels, selections seem to be few...
roadster with a stick
Last edited by Franc Rauscher; May 26, 2010 at 05:04 PM.
Originally Posted by mrobinso
I drive a NA Limited Coupe with the 6-speed (not for long though, trading in the Cross and picking up an '06 C55 with 32,000 miles on Saturday) and I can honestly say that for the underpowered 215hp engine of the Limited, and the heavy 3300 lb (give or take) curb weight, the manual transmission seems to really make the car seem quicker, louder, and more involving.
Now I am sure Limited Coupe owners with the auto tranny are going to bash me for saying that, but when I can rev the engine up to 5500rpms in each gear - I tend to forget that something like a Civic SI can beat me off the line, and it reminds me that I am driving a finely-tuned European sports car, not a Chrysler.
If I lived in a rural or less-populated area I would try to find another manual transmission vehicle. However, being that I am located just outside of Washington, D.C. - driving can be a hellish experience most times of the day and the stop and go traffic is no place for a manual transmission.
Additionally, the shifter is definitely notchy and has its quirks but as any 6-speed Crossfire owner knows, you come love the quirks and adapt to the clunkiness of the shifter. Also, the Crossfire (especially 2004 model year) is known for its particularly clunky first gear where sometimes the shifter will pop suddenly out of gear.
Now I am sure Limited Coupe owners with the auto tranny are going to bash me for saying that, but when I can rev the engine up to 5500rpms in each gear - I tend to forget that something like a Civic SI can beat me off the line, and it reminds me that I am driving a finely-tuned European sports car, not a Chrysler.
If I lived in a rural or less-populated area I would try to find another manual transmission vehicle. However, being that I am located just outside of Washington, D.C. - driving can be a hellish experience most times of the day and the stop and go traffic is no place for a manual transmission.
Additionally, the shifter is definitely notchy and has its quirks but as any 6-speed Crossfire owner knows, you come love the quirks and adapt to the clunkiness of the shifter. Also, the Crossfire (especially 2004 model year) is known for its particularly clunky first gear where sometimes the shifter will pop suddenly out of gear.
Currently if you're ordering a new Ferrari 458 you can't get it with a stick. I don't believe they'll make one for it either. Anyone ever see an Enzo with a stick? No? well that's because they didn't make a stick for that one either. This isn't because customers wouldn't buy one either.
I honestly can't wait until I can get a car with Porsche's new transmission the "Doppelkupplungsgetriebe". This thing is just awesome.
The SRT doesn't have a stick, and unless you've got really deep pocket's it won't have one. My advise, learn it, play with it constantly, and you'll eventually figure out why it works the way it works.
Originally Posted by cdvntx
I fully expected to see people mating their SRTs with manuals and more appearance mods. I'd like to do something to mine to make it a little more unique, but even changing the wheels, selections seem to be few...
Although, I may be a little biased
Originally Posted by cdvntx
Well this is my first Crossfire and I have put less than 300 miles on it. I hope to drive others with a manual. There seems to be many others saying the same thing. Is the manual an MB design or something off the self from Chrysler?
Actually, I shouldn't be so obsessive about the transmission, unless of course I get 2 SRTs. 1 to reward and baby and 1 to punish on the track. Ha!
I fully expected to see people mating their SRTs with manuals and more appearance mods. I'd like to do something to mine to make it a little more unique, but even changing the wheels, selections seem to be few...
Actually, I shouldn't be so obsessive about the transmission, unless of course I get 2 SRTs. 1 to reward and baby and 1 to punish on the track. Ha!
I fully expected to see people mating their SRTs with manuals and more appearance mods. I'd like to do something to mine to make it a little more unique, but even changing the wheels, selections seem to be few...
i did try to add vtec to mine and i mounted a big wing on top of my wing but it kept falling off so i gave up. now i just drive mine stock and just accept that is good enough.
xzibit.jpg
YO MAN I HEARD YOU LIKE WINGS SO WE PUT A WING ON YOUR WING SO YOU CAN HAVE DOWNFORCE ON YOUR DOWNFORCE!
Last edited by mrphotoman; May 26, 2010 at 05:31 PM.
I think that most people mod their Mustangs, Camaros and ricers because, except for the mods, they are driving rather common cars. The Crossfire is hardly common, so mods are often more about personal preferences than trying to be different from the crowd.
The production numbers are rather low for the Crossie. So aside from their unique design, they are already statitsicaly uncommon.
Hence the lack of a plethera of common aftermarket mods available to make them different.
roadster with a stick
The production numbers are rather low for the Crossie. So aside from their unique design, they are already statitsicaly uncommon.
Hence the lack of a plethera of common aftermarket mods available to make them different.
roadster with a stick
Last edited by Franc Rauscher; May 26, 2010 at 05:07 PM.
mrphotoman - if you look at your signature photo from the right angle - you can almost make out the coffeecan aftermarket exhausts to go with your double wing
Originally Posted by mrobinso
mrphotoman - if you look at your signature photo from the right angle - you can almost make out the coffeecan aftermarket exhausts to go with your double wing 
I have had some pretty trick auto's in my day...so, I don't have a problem driving me auto with anyone....besides, anything more that 4 gears is just wasteful....lol....
Originally Posted by oledoc2u
I have had some pretty trick auto's in my day...so, I don't have a problem driving me auto with anyone....besides, anything more that 4 gears is just wasteful....lol....
After Eurocharged reworked my engine I found I didn't really need fifth gear. So I put it up onEbay but got no bids.
Amazing 'cause it's still in the box.
Automatics today are not the fragile, tender and finicky slushboxes of the fifties and sixties. Nor are they the lightweight emergency solutions to fledgling front wheel drive systems from the eighties and nineties
The auto stick in Crumpy's minivan is a silly bit of worthless machinery with a pretentious label on the dash board. The auto stick in her SRT is awesome!
This from a guy who hates automatics.
roadster with a stick
Last edited by Franc Rauscher; May 28, 2010 at 12:11 PM.
Auto/manual debates in regards to modern cars always puzzle me.
I feel that it's similar to the anti FI (NO MAN U NEED MORE CYLINDERS TO BE FAST IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW FAST UR TURBO IS IT ISN'T THE SAME!!!!) crowd.
I like whatever gives the best results. Sometimes FI on a smaller engine is faster than an old fashioned bigger one, and these days auto is almost always faster than manual.
Yes, you may lose some of the 'boy-racer' fun, but at the end of the day you'll perform better, so who cares?
I feel that it's similar to the anti FI (NO MAN U NEED MORE CYLINDERS TO BE FAST IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW FAST UR TURBO IS IT ISN'T THE SAME!!!!) crowd.
I like whatever gives the best results. Sometimes FI on a smaller engine is faster than an old fashioned bigger one, and these days auto is almost always faster than manual.
Yes, you may lose some of the 'boy-racer' fun, but at the end of the day you'll perform better, so who cares?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vspuds
Engine, Exhaust, Transmission and Differential
10
Oct 11, 2018 05:16 PM
adamlevy
All Crossfires
2
Jun 7, 2015 08:13 PM
krooner
Troubleshooting & Technical Questions & Modifications
11
Jul 30, 2003 02:17 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)



