Crossfire SRT6 A place to discuss SRT-6 specific topics.

R170 Chassis

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 5, 2016 | 01:34 PM
  #1 (permalink)  
Buchacho's Avatar
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Default R170 Chassis

What is our R170 Chassis made out of? I've been looking but no luck... I'm trying to figure out where all the car's weight is from, 3,200 pounds of curb weight seems a bit steep... Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2016 | 02:14 PM
  #2 (permalink)  
ala_xfire's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 12,780
Likes: 184
From: Lineville, AL
Default Re: R170 Chassis

The frame is forged from unobtanium by Albanian dwarfs, the wheels are forged in Poland from depleted uranium and the body panels are really solid gold underneath obtained from an old **** cache that MB had access to.
 

Last edited by ala_xfire; Apr 5, 2016 at 04:38 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2016 | 04:10 PM
  #3 (permalink)  
Steve Jr's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 4
From: Knoxville
Default Re: R170 Chassis

I went to Asgard, an picked up some patch peices.
 
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2016 | 04:39 PM
  #4 (permalink)  
ala_xfire's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 12,780
Likes: 184
From: Lineville, AL
Default Re: R170 Chassis

I order mine from the Shire in Middle Earth ......


But to digress, Buchacho I have no idea why they are so heavy, but that is a 2 edged sword.
The heavier they are , the better cruisers they are at the expense of improved handling, acceleration and braking.
I'm just happy they decided to use metal, not fiberglass.
I guess the sub frame and body panels all could have been aluminum, but then everyone would be paranoid about corrosion.
You can't have everything, my momma always said.
 

Last edited by ala_xfire; Apr 5, 2016 at 04:43 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2016 | 07:40 PM
  #5 (permalink)  
Power Sedan's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 247
Likes: 1
From: Wisconsin
Default Re: R170 Chassis

Wow, my opinion was the exact opposite with weight. I own two LX Platform sedans that come in at 4,300-4,400 each. I've always driven a daily driver the comes in at almost 3 tons.

First opinion on this vehicle was, "Cool, finally something that has reduced weight." I've been on the various LX forums for over a decade, and some of the most popular threads... weight reduction, weight reduction, weight reduction. When I bought this SRT, combined with much research on this forum (before joining ), with the modification costs, verses performance, and weight reduction. Couldn't be happier with the purchase! With all the money I've dumped into one of my LX platforms, I could have paid for SL55 swap by now.
 
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2016 | 11:08 AM
  #6 (permalink)  
Travish's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Greensboro NC
Default Re: R170 Chassis

I think part of the reason they are so heavy is if there is a 3" space they stuffed a 2" part in that hole. The cars may be small but with all the sensors/relays/computer stuff it seems like the components were fit into anywhere there was a space.
 
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2016 | 01:13 PM
  #7 (permalink)  
philosophico's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 500
Likes: 29
Default Re: R170 Chassis

I can understand why the actually MB SLK on this chassis is heavy, I just blamed the folding hard top. When it came to the XF you'd think it would have lost weight since no folding hard top, but nope. For a car this small it weighs more then alot of 4 door sub compacts.

I guess MB just design there cars to be fat and to overcome that they just give them more power for the ones who need it.
 
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2016 | 03:20 PM
  #8 (permalink)  
Da55id's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 560
Likes: 15
From: Northern Virginia
Default Re: R170 Chassis

For my part I'm happy that the car was designed with the stiffness needed to be a superb platform for the roadster. If that's where some of the weight is, I'm glad it's there.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2016 | 05:23 PM
  #9 (permalink)  
JEFASOLD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,709
Likes: 10
Default Re: R170 Chassis

There seems to be some divergence as to thoughts about weight. The Xfire is NOT a heavy car, several hundred lbs lighter than a 'Vette, quite a few below the Viper. Not as light as a MX5 or Alpha Romeo, which has a CF tub. The only way to make an ultra stiff and ultra light frame is with ultra expensive exotic materials. Personally, I think our cars have a very good compromise between the two, it was and still is a pretty good chassis, considering the design intent.
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2016 | 10:50 PM
  #10 (permalink)  
Montana Crossfire's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 1
From: Great Falls, Montana ( Big Sky Country)
Default Re: R170 Chassis

Stiffest chassis, least flex in its' class, 3200lbs. Heavy? should have bought jap if you were looking for a Honda...
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2016 | 11:13 AM
  #11 (permalink)  
ZX2 Nick's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 274
Likes: 10
From: Clinton, Michigan
Default Re: R170 Chassis

A Crossfire weighs 3200 lbs with a 150 lb driver.
My 2005 Limited 6sp weighs 3050 lbs with 1/2 tank of gas an no driver according to the drive on scale I have used numerous times. It's a farm scale used to weigh trucks before and after loading.
The Crossfire is far from a heavy car.
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2016 | 03:24 PM
  #12 (permalink)  
boostmonkey's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Default

Mine SLK32 AMG R170 weighed 3215 on a truck scale without me of it.

There isn't much in this weight class available with SRT6/32 kompressor power.
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2016 | 04:33 PM
  #13 (permalink)  
philosophico's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 500
Likes: 29
Default Re: R170 Chassis

Originally Posted by Montana Crossfire
Stiffest chassis, least flex in its' class, 3200lbs. Heavy? should have bought jap if you were looking for a Honda...
Your right about the stiff chassis. If you try to go up a steep driveway at an angle it will lift one of the rear wheels off and get stuck. I had this happen to me, and had to back out of that driveway.
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2016 | 05:49 PM
  #14 (permalink)  
boostmonkey's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by philosophico

Your right about the stiff chassis. If you try to go up a steep driveway at an angle it will lift one of the rear wheels off and get stuck. I had this happen to me, and had to back out of that driveway.
That is hilarious. Sounds like when you jack up both ends by jacking up the front wheel.
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2016 | 07:18 PM
  #15 (permalink)  
onehundred80's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 25,432
Likes: 648
From: Ontario
Default Re: R170 Chassis

Originally Posted by boostmonkey
Mine SLK32 AMG R170 weighed 3215 on a truck scale without me of it.

There isn't much in this weight class available with SRT6/32 kompressor power.
From the official specs. It does not say if any fuel is on board, so I imagine the weight is the dry weight.
2005 SRT weight
Coupe 3240 (1469 kg)
Roadster 3328 (1509 kg)

2005 NA weight
3010 lbs. (1365 kg)—Base Coupe;
3061 lbs. (1388 kg)—Coupe Limited, manual;
3084 lbs. (1399 kg)—Coupe Limited, automatic;
3089 lbs. (1401 kg)—Base Roadster;
3140 lbs. (1424 kg)—Roadster Limited, manual;
3174 lbs. (1440 kg)—Roadster Limited, automatic
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
budaman
Crossfire Coupe
19
May 5, 2016 12:20 AM
ala_xfire
Crossfire Events and Meets
4
Apr 12, 2016 10:08 AM
Valk
Canada
7
Apr 10, 2016 08:19 PM
WindRestrictor
Commercial Sponsor Classifieds
0
Mar 14, 2016 09:19 PM
12345
Troubleshooting & Technical Questions & Modifications
6
Feb 29, 2016 03:33 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:09 AM.