Engine, Exhaust, Transmission and Differential Post questions here that have to do with the engine, cooling system, air intake, exhaust, Transmission and Differential

Interesting Results... K&N, GREENS, STOCK FILTERS

Thread Tools
 
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-20-2007, 05:48 PM
Sidez's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Interesting Results... K&N, GREENS, STOCK FILTERS

The research bellow was done by c32used of mbworld.org and by no way belongs to me... I give him credit here for his research...

Wanted to post the results of the 3 filters as I found this information very interesting...

"Ok Guys...

Here are the results on the track that tells differences if any with the more popular choices compared to stock air filters. Basically I see no major difference with the aftermarket filters but definitely see a difference with the stock filters. All runs were by the same guys with time inbetween for cooling while replacing filters. Conditions were near perfect for the SC cars. Its all preference guys between the two aftermarket filters. My preference is the Greens but the K&N seem better built. By the way if you haven't read my thread on this the K&N cleaner does a better job at cleaning the Green filters.

The 1st pic shows the best run with the K&N filters. (13.4360 @ 104.58)
The 2nd pic shows best time with Green filters. (13.4602 @ 103.93)
The 3rd shows best with stock filters. (13.9038 @ 101.60)

The 4th run well its my car besting a stock E55 who's non-owner driver made a huge burnout but almost caught me but I will take the momentary win
C32used 13.5780 @ 103.93 ChicagoX 14.9370 @ 104.89"
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-21-2007, 12:44 PM
jonnyangel04's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lakeville, MN/ River Falls, WI
Posts: 1,613
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Interesting Results... K&N, GREENS, STOCK FILTERS

already posted under filters...
 
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-21-2007, 04:43 PM
Sidez's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Re: Interesting Results... K&N, GREENS, STOCK FILTERS

Originally Posted by jonnyangel04
already posted under filters...
what? under what filters?
 
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-21-2007, 07:28 PM
jonnyangel04's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lakeville, MN/ River Falls, WI
Posts: 1,613
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Interesting Results... K&N, GREENS, STOCK FILTERS

i posted it up with the title filters... I have green i paid more then K&Ns but great information.
 
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-24-2007, 09:15 PM
x'ed's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Interesting Results... K&N, GREENS, STOCK FILTERS

13.9 in a c32, that's pathetic, should be running a 13.4 or faster.
 
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-24-2007, 09:51 PM
Sidez's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Re: Interesting Results... K&N, GREENS, STOCK FILTERS

Originally Posted by x'ed
13.9 in a c32, that's pathetic, should be running a 13.4 or faster.
depends on the conditions, weather, and there are just to many variables to really state what the car should be running that we do not know about...
but yea I agree for some reason that is not a very good time...
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
velociabstract
Wheels, Brakes, Tires and Suspension
0
08-07-2015 01:30 PM
MAXIMUM
Cars For Sale - Archive
7
08-04-2015 11:04 PM
Sweet2002
Crossfire SRT6
8
07-29-2015 06:13 PM
Sweet2002
Crossfire SRT6
0
07-17-2015 07:21 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Interesting Results... K&N, GREENS, STOCK FILTERS



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:18 AM.