Official N/A Gains Thread
You'll just go through clutches like crazy... lol Unless you modify a Spec. The 3.7l SRT is the way I wanted to go with my spare motor but to do it I need the 55 amg pistons and those are the big bucks. Not worth the cost IMO. If you did it to the NA though you have more of a chance of it not costing the same as 2 crossfire's.
I just said goodbye to the V8 Crossfire. It is now on its way to AZ. the new onwer, (CalHusky on here) seemed to really like the car. He has some neat plans for the car which I am sure he will share on here.
Well, it think it will not work for long, because of the torque. The Crossfire MT can handle a max. of 400 Nm. If you go over this number it's only a matter of time till it breaks. The Kleemann 3.7 has 525 Nm. So i wouldn't recommend a combination with a MT. The NAG 722.6 AT transmission can handle up to 900 Nm (when it's modified) and 560 Nm if you modify the W5A330 to W5A560 SRT6 standards . If you combine that with a AMG speed shift TCU and paddles, you'll have a much better fast shifting and durable solution.
Regards
Markus
Regards
Markus
Well, it think it will not work for long, because of the torque. The Crossfire MT can handle a max. of 400 Nm. If you go over this number it's only a matter of time till it breaks. The Kleemann 3.7 has 525 Nm. So i wouldn't recommend a combination with a MT. The NAG 722.6 AT transmission can handle up to 900 Nm (when it's modified) and 560 Nm if you modify the W5A330 to W5A560 SRT6 standards . If you combine that with a AMG speed shift TCU and paddles, you'll have a much better fast shifting and durable solution.
Regards
Markus
Regards
Markus
i think the srt is just your solution the pump out much more power and can be modified a bit more than the n/a , at the moment im just loving my car, im just not drag racing others cars, i dont really know how i will stand up to them , so i enjoy my dream car for what she is! unless i can turbo her... then shes getting a big fat turbo....
i think the srt is just your solution the pump out much more power and can be modified a bit more than the n/a , at the moment im just loving my car, im just not drag racing others cars, i dont really know how i will stand up to them , so i enjoy my dream car for what she is! unless i can turbo her... then shes getting a big fat turbo....
There is a guy on the MBworld forum with a CLK500 and a 6 speed MT, and 2 guys with SRT motors in NA's. Other than clutches they are doing fine.
Is that the one I was hearing about that costs 20,000?
I was a bit disappointed with this. I've had a search and am now more confused with people quoting BHP at the wheels etc. and can't seem to find a good basline as to what a stock car should dyno at roughly (none seem to get near the quoted 215). As far as I am aware the Dyno D only produces a flywheel approximation, so this is not the case with all dynos?
Anyway, mine is attached, it made 199.8 HP with the following mods:
Pipercross Induction Kit Air Intake System
Long Life stainless cat back exhaust
Top Gear Tuning re-map
What do you think?
Anyway, mine is attached, it made 199.8 HP with the following mods:
Pipercross Induction Kit Air Intake System
Long Life stainless cat back exhaust
Top Gear Tuning re-map
What do you think?
I was a bit disappointed with this. I've had a search and am now more confused with people quoting BHP at the wheels etc. and can't seem to find a good basline as to what a stock car should dyno at roughly (none seem to get near the quoted 215). As far as I am aware the Dyno D only produces a flywheel approximation, so this is not the case with all dynos?
Anyway, mine is attached, it made 199.8 HP with the following mods:
Pipercross Induction Kit Air Intake System
Long Life stainless cat back exhaust
Top Gear Tuning re-map
What do you think?
Anyway, mine is attached, it made 199.8 HP with the following mods:
Pipercross Induction Kit Air Intake System
Long Life stainless cat back exhaust
Top Gear Tuning re-map
What do you think?
.
I'd be interested to know what other people have had their n/a cars dyno'd at. I keep seeing lots figures for "at the wheels", but haven't found any figures like mine that approximate at the flywheels - is this a USA/UK thing?
We've put around 10 stock cars on a race calibrated dyno in 2013 and 2014. They were all around 200 HP (196 - 204).
We also had some cars with slight mods. Best one was 206 HP.
Exhaust mods in general had a little less max. power.
I know a N/A car that has real 250 HP at the rear wheels. But that had very cost intensive modiications. Ported heads, other camshafts, 200 cell cats, complete different air intake system, new injectors and so on and was optimized on the dyno.
Air filters, ECU tunes, sport exhausts are just a waste of time and money. If you get 10 hp out iof that stuff your'e lucky.
My car stays stock, because i don't care if i have 10-20 hp more or not.
If you want more hp, just bay a SRT6.
We also had some cars with slight mods. Best one was 206 HP.
Exhaust mods in general had a little less max. power.
I know a N/A car that has real 250 HP at the rear wheels. But that had very cost intensive modiications. Ported heads, other camshafts, 200 cell cats, complete different air intake system, new injectors and so on and was optimized on the dyno.
Air filters, ECU tunes, sport exhausts are just a waste of time and money. If you get 10 hp out iof that stuff your'e lucky.
My car stays stock, because i don't care if i have 10-20 hp more or not.
If you want more hp, just bay a SRT6.
Only way to get flywheel hp is with engine on a stand, some that run dyno at the wheels use the percentage to estimate the flywheel hp, normal automatics loose 20-30 % hp from flywheel to the wheels with rotational mass, manuals usually 15 - 25 % with rotational mass, but with our manuals the heavy dual mass flywheel puts ours higher in the % range, makes the wheel hp on the manuals vs automatic more equal but with the flywheel does help with torque some.
That is why racers like rotary forged wheels, aluminum or carbon fiber driveshaft, aluminum flywheel etc.
Those bigger brake rotors help stopping but also increases rotational weight.
1 lbs of rotational weight equals 10 lbs of static weight.
So if you put rotary forged wheels on the back and save 10 lbs of rotational weight you can gain 100 lbs over the holidays and your car will have the same performance.
They also say that removing 10 lbs of rotational weight will remove .1 sec of 1/4.
Me I like handling
That is why racers like rotary forged wheels, aluminum or carbon fiber driveshaft, aluminum flywheel etc.
Those bigger brake rotors help stopping but also increases rotational weight.
1 lbs of rotational weight equals 10 lbs of static weight.
So if you put rotary forged wheels on the back and save 10 lbs of rotational weight you can gain 100 lbs over the holidays and your car will have the same performance.
They also say that removing 10 lbs of rotational weight will remove .1 sec of 1/4.
Me I like handling


