dumb question: Crossfire and AMX, what's the connection?
I actually owned a 72 amc javelin, the Amx was the same car with a shortened wheelbase and only 2 seats. The crossfire is more similar to the amx than the javelyn. But u can say both of the cars are similar but theres no other connection than both having 2 seats, big engines, and both are head turning rear wheeled drive cars.
And i agree if Chrysler or back then Daimler had named the crossfire the AMX they probably would have sold many more of them, but like everything else Daimler botched this up also, kinda like they basically killed Chrysler.
In the late 90's Chrysler was the most profitable car company in the world (even more profitable than Toyota is today). Chrysler also had about 10 billion in the bank for future R&D. Then Daimler bought Chrysler, looted them and botched basically every good thing about Chrysler.
The only good thing to come from the merger was the Crossfire, of which I own 2!
And i agree if Chrysler or back then Daimler had named the crossfire the AMX they probably would have sold many more of them, but like everything else Daimler botched this up also, kinda like they basically killed Chrysler.
In the late 90's Chrysler was the most profitable car company in the world (even more profitable than Toyota is today). Chrysler also had about 10 billion in the bank for future R&D. Then Daimler bought Chrysler, looted them and botched basically every good thing about Chrysler.
The only good thing to come from the merger was the Crossfire, of which I own 2!
Originally Posted by James1549
From this prospective, it has Marlin written all over it !


My curiosity finally got the better of me and I actually wrote to the "Creator" (Eric Stoddard) and asked him if the Marlin was indeed his inspiration for the Crossfires roofline.
He wrote back and told me he never thought about the Marlin while creating the Crossfire.
That the main inspiration for the Crossfire design were cars like the Auburn boattail Speedster, and later the 63 Corvette and 68
Mustang fastback.
Even though he doesn't realize it, I still think there had to be a "subliminal" "Marlin" image floating around in that very talented mind of his.
Originally Posted by +fireamx
Spotsbimmer, essentially you're corrrect, of course. But the 1968/69 AMX (besides being 12" shorter than the Javelin) also had a different hood, grill, and rear 1/4 panel (including "C" pillar). Along with standard torque links aka "traction bars".
That being said, the difference between the ride and handling (and general performance) between the two cars would very nearly be like comparing a Limited Crossfire to a Sebring.
Your analogy is one that would probably be made by many, and one that would rub the "average" AMX owner the wrong way. (good thing all the Crossfire/AMX owners on this forum are anything but average).

That being said, the difference between the ride and handling (and general performance) between the two cars would very nearly be like comparing a Limited Crossfire to a Sebring.
Your analogy is one that would probably be made by many, and one that would rub the "average" AMX owner the wrong way. (good thing all the Crossfire/AMX owners on this forum are anything but average).
This video is just too funny not to post: (the dates listed are wrong, this was a 1968 AMX prototype, "Richard Teagues" personal car).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4R6gq...eature=related
What's scary, is I remember watching this show on "black & white" TV when I was 17 years old.
40 years sure do fly by.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4R6gq...eature=related
What's scary, is I remember watching this show on "black & white" TV when I was 17 years old.
40 years sure do fly by.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mhajek18
TSBs and How-To Articles
1
Jun 17, 2015 01:35 PM
WindRestrictor
Commercial Sponsor Classifieds
0
Jun 1, 2015 02:31 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)



