Crossfire Service Manual Download
I dont know if this is all that correct...
For example it says that the engine holds 6.1qts of oil... ? (with filter).
Correct me if im wrong but I thought that the engine held 8 to 8.5 qts... ?
Oh, and by the way, do non supercharged xf's have map sensors? (it says on this manual but I havent been able to locate it in the engine... ?)
For example it says that the engine holds 6.1qts of oil... ? (with filter).
Correct me if im wrong but I thought that the engine held 8 to 8.5 qts... ?
Oh, and by the way, do non supercharged xf's have map sensors? (it says on this manual but I havent been able to locate it in the engine... ?)
Originally Posted by basslover911
I dont know if this is all that correct...
For example it says that the engine holds 6.1qts of oil... ? (with filter).
Correct me if im wrong but I thought that the engine held 8 to 8.5 qts... ?
Oh, and by the way, do non supercharged xf's have map sensors? (it says on this manual but I havent been able to locate it in the engine... ?)
For example it says that the engine holds 6.1qts of oil... ? (with filter).
Correct me if im wrong but I thought that the engine held 8 to 8.5 qts... ?
Oh, and by the way, do non supercharged xf's have map sensors? (it says on this manual but I havent been able to locate it in the engine... ?)
Originally Posted by basslover911
I dont know if this is all that correct...
For example it says that the engine holds 6.1qts of oil... ? (with filter).
Correct me if im wrong but I thought that the engine held 8 to 8.5 qts... ?
For example it says that the engine holds 6.1qts of oil... ? (with filter).
Correct me if im wrong but I thought that the engine held 8 to 8.5 qts... ?
Last edited by Iamfink2; Nov 13, 2007 at 04:09 PM.
Originally Posted by Iamfink2
I believe in the earlier manuals it was a misprint in the 2005 owners manual is says 8.5 qts.
Originally Posted by Jeep2Xfire
That doesn't make sense. How could a forced induction motor use a MAP sensor. Kinda pointless like having vacuum assisted power brakes.
Without getting to technical, MAP stands for "manifold absolute pressure". These sensors compare vacuum reading inside the intake manifold to the outside atmospheric pressure, 14.7 psi at sea level. Many manufactures call them by other names but MOST cars have them and if you ever remove them or disconnect the vacuum source not only will you set a code and a check engine light your "performance" and idle will suffer. If you have a turbo or supercharger they typically are used to sense "boost" pressure, but some OEM's use two, one for vacuum and one for boost pressure, again, sometimes they use different names.
Greg
Greg
I think in another thread it seemed the Crossfire has both MAP and MAF Manifold Air Flow, strange if it's true.
MAP can be just as important on a NA engine as forced induction one, I suppose you could think of it as a measure of how much air the engine is trying to suck in - and so an indication of how much fuel is needed.
Actually I don't think it is essential to use either a MAP or MAF some systems seem to use just a wideband sensor, throttle position and rpm - they are not exactly tuned for economy or emmisions and usally run very "lumpy" cams that MAP sensors struggle with.
MAP can be just as important on a NA engine as forced induction one, I suppose you could think of it as a measure of how much air the engine is trying to suck in - and so an indication of how much fuel is needed.
Actually I don't think it is essential to use either a MAP or MAF some systems seem to use just a wideband sensor, throttle position and rpm - they are not exactly tuned for economy or emmisions and usally run very "lumpy" cams that MAP sensors struggle with.
MAF stands for MAss Air Flow, and it's usually located on the plenum or ductwork before the air filter housing. It isn't used for sensing manifold pressure / vacuum, it senses the amount of air flowing into the air filter assembly.
Originally Posted by Choppers07
MAF stands for MAss Air Flow, and it's usually located on the plenum or ductwork before the air filter housing. It isn't used for sensing manifold pressure / vacuum, it senses the amount of air flowing into the air filter assembly.
Checked the service manual and the Crossfire does have both MAP and MAF sensors, wonder why they went for both.
Depending on valve overlap, engine vacuum is generated. The MAP sensor would be placed below the throttle plate and it compares the amount of vacuum to sea level pressure or whatever pressure you at from altitude if used with a BARO sensor. This comparison is in the fuel mapping within the ECM. Use of MAP sensors are known as a "Speed Density" system and aren't as efficient as a MAF or Mass Air Flow sensor the "counts" the incoming air and measures in grams/cm3. There are different types of MAFs like a Vane Air Flow and the hotwire that uses current to heat a resistor in the intake air charge and that charge cools the resistor. The current is then altered to keep that resistor at a specific temp. When I made the comment about the MAPs being useless in a forced induction environment, I stand by that for the simple fact that with a supercharger there isn't a vacuum. There is always pressure greater than one atmosphere within the intake plenum. In a NA environment, vacuum is greatest @ idle (normally 17-22 inHg) and then as the throttle plate opens (stepping on the accelerator) atmospheric pressure is let in equalizing the pressure above and below the throttle plate which is how that specific sensor "measures" air. It really doesn't measure air but extrapolates or makes a guess.
Originally Posted by Jeep2Xfire
When I made the comment about the MAPs being useless in a forced induction environment, I stand by that for the simple fact that with a supercharger there isn't a vacuum. There is always pressure greater than one atmosphere within the intake plenum. In a NA environment, vacuum is greatest @ idle (normally 17-22 inHg) and then as the throttle plate opens (stepping on the accelerator) atmospheric pressure is let in equalizing the pressure above and below the throttle plate which is how that specific sensor "measures" air. It really doesn't measure air but extrapolates or makes a guess.
I think you underestimate the value of a vacuum (or more precisely differential in pressure) in metering fuel, a well set up carb isn't doing any "guessing".
Anyone know if the SRT uses a bypass in the manifold to reduce pumping losses at part throttle? (when there is a vacuum reading in the manifold).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bourbonton
Troubleshooting & Technical Questions & Modifications
5
May 29, 2015 02:51 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)



