View Single Post
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 09:21 AM
  #24 (permalink)  
MMZ_TimeLord's Avatar
MMZ_TimeLord
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,945
Likes: 23
From: San Mateo, CA, USA, Earth, Sol, Milkyway
Default Re: SLK32 with Schricks cams

Faster ramp rates and more duration with slightly higher lift will usually result in more overlap or create it if it wasn't there to begin with.

The C32 video sounded very mild to me. Very streetable. I suspect that at another 100 RPM higher it smoothes right out.

Again, this is the nature of more aggressive cams.

I too would be curious about dyno numbers before and after with just the cams changed on a stock motor. Then a before and after with the Schrick cams and stock ECU to a tuned ECU. Then with a bigger pulley... then another ECU tune... etc.

Baby steps ... I've seen this done by a tuner before and he logged all the changes.

Modern engines RARELY have big increases from a single mod. So I would expect that the Schrick cams would be no different.

Cheers!

EDIT: Posted by HDDP in another thread. (I presume by mistake )

The specs for the OEM cam are:
Lift @ Lobe / Intake 6.59mm / Exhaust 6.73mm
Lift @ Valve / Intake 9.8mm / Exhaust 10mm

The Specs for the Schrick Cams are:
Lift @ Lobe / Intake 7.25mm / Exhaust 7.25mm
Lift @ Valve / Intake 10.8mm / Exhaust 10.8mm
 

Last edited by MMZ_TimeLord; Jan 23, 2008 at 09:24 AM.
Reply