SLK32 with Schricks cams
Originally Posted by Maxwell
HEy I'm not affraid to be proved wrong, infact I enjoy being corrected, as this is how I learn.
he's using the wrong cams. duh....
Originally Posted by Maxwell
anyways there is nothing technical about it, a supercharger cam should not sound lopey...
Supercharged cars aren't supposed to have a lopey idle? You need to go to the drags or classic car show!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JKJXWO6yF8
Originally Posted by msheredy
This is exactly what I mean. You have never been more incorrect. Obviously you have never swapped cams in a car. When you put a high performance cam in the inherit nature is a lopier idle. Ask ANY engine builder.
Supercharged cars aren't supposed to have a lopey idle? You need to go to the drags or classic car show!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JKJXWO6yF8
from what I understand it's the lobe overlapp time which dictates if a cam is going to have a lopey idle.
And our NA cams are more agressive when compared to boost cams, because the NA cam is using the scavenging effect to increase cylinder fill of the air/fuel mix, by allowing the exhaust gasses to pull a low pressure point on the cylinder. This increases the velocity of the incoming air into the cylinder. much like a two stroke motor.
On a boost cam, it has less overlap version than the NA cam because, the super charger is feeding the cylinder it's air/fuel mix, so there is no need to have a the cam which creates the scavenging effect.
now if you put the NA cam in the superchaged engine, you will be loosing cylinder pressure because of the overlap of the NA cam with leave the exhaust valve open, thus letting the undurned pressurize air/fuel mix to blow out the exhaust manifolds.
NOw why does my N/A M112 motor, idle smooth as silk at 500rpm, while this guys SC m112 sound so lopy at 500rpm? Maybe he has a vacuum leak.? because I know the boost cam will not creat a lopy effect, the schricks cams do have more lift, but they are a custom grind and are not listed in their catalouge, which also makes me wonder about the design or if this guy has the correct cams installed.
Last edited by Maxwell; Jan 23, 2008 at 08:31 AM.
Originally Posted by Maxwell
HEy I'm not affraid to be proved wrong, infact I enjoy being corrected, as this is how I learn.
anyways there is nothing technical about it, a supercharger cam should not sound lopey, even at 500rpm, as my stock NA motor idles at 500rpm and there is absolutely no lope to it's exhaust.....maybe there is a vacuum leak on his motor somwhere?......otherwise, if the motor is tight with no leaks I don't think you guys have the right cam. can you understand my logic?
I'm sorry for being so inquizitive, but I would like to see some dyno graphs of a before and after cam swap on the 32 motor. I'm really curious as to how the graph has moved around.
Anybody know how many mm of lift the Boost cams from schricks gained vs. oem cams?
anyways there is nothing technical about it, a supercharger cam should not sound lopey, even at 500rpm, as my stock NA motor idles at 500rpm and there is absolutely no lope to it's exhaust.....maybe there is a vacuum leak on his motor somwhere?......otherwise, if the motor is tight with no leaks I don't think you guys have the right cam. can you understand my logic?
I'm sorry for being so inquizitive, but I would like to see some dyno graphs of a before and after cam swap on the 32 motor. I'm really curious as to how the graph has moved around.
Anybody know how many mm of lift the Boost cams from schricks gained vs. oem cams?
"If I remember correctly they have 2mm more lift on the intake and ~.1mm more lift on the exhaust. The cams also had very faster ramp rates and more duration."
Faster ramp rates and more duration with slightly higher lift will usually result in more overlap or create it if it wasn't there to begin with.
The C32 video sounded very mild to me. Very streetable. I suspect that at another 100 RPM higher it smoothes right out.
Again, this is the nature of more aggressive cams.
I too would be curious about dyno numbers before and after with just the cams changed on a stock motor. Then a before and after with the Schrick cams and stock ECU to a tuned ECU. Then with a bigger pulley... then another ECU tune... etc.
Baby steps ... I've seen this done by a tuner before and he logged all the changes.
Modern engines RARELY have big increases from a single mod. So I would expect that the Schrick cams would be no different.
Cheers!
EDIT: Posted by HDDP in another thread. (I presume by mistake
)
The specs for the OEM cam are:
Lift @ Lobe / Intake 6.59mm / Exhaust 6.73mm
Lift @ Valve / Intake 9.8mm / Exhaust 10mm
The Specs for the Schrick Cams are:
Lift @ Lobe / Intake 7.25mm / Exhaust 7.25mm
Lift @ Valve / Intake 10.8mm / Exhaust 10.8mm
The C32 video sounded very mild to me. Very streetable. I suspect that at another 100 RPM higher it smoothes right out.
Again, this is the nature of more aggressive cams.
I too would be curious about dyno numbers before and after with just the cams changed on a stock motor. Then a before and after with the Schrick cams and stock ECU to a tuned ECU. Then with a bigger pulley... then another ECU tune... etc.
Baby steps ... I've seen this done by a tuner before and he logged all the changes.
Modern engines RARELY have big increases from a single mod. So I would expect that the Schrick cams would be no different.
Cheers!
EDIT: Posted by HDDP in another thread. (I presume by mistake
The specs for the OEM cam are:
Lift @ Lobe / Intake 6.59mm / Exhaust 6.73mm
Lift @ Valve / Intake 9.8mm / Exhaust 10mm
The Specs for the Schrick Cams are:
Lift @ Lobe / Intake 7.25mm / Exhaust 7.25mm
Lift @ Valve / Intake 10.8mm / Exhaust 10.8mm
Last edited by MMZ_TimeLord; Jan 23, 2008 at 09:24 AM.
Originally Posted by Maxwell
we are not talking about drag cars, this is a street car.
Originally Posted by Maxwell
...from what I understand it's the lobe overlapp time which dictates if a cam is going to have a lopey idle...
...NOw why does my N/A M112 motor, idle smooth as silk at 500rpm, while this guys SC m112 sound so lopy at 500rpm? Maybe he has a vacuum leak.? because I know the boost cam will not creat a lopy effect, the schricks cams do have more lift, but they are a custom grind and are not listed in their catalouge, which also makes me wonder about the design or if this guy has the correct cams installed.
...NOw why does my N/A M112 motor, idle smooth as silk at 500rpm, while this guys SC m112 sound so lopy at 500rpm? Maybe he has a vacuum leak.? because I know the boost cam will not creat a lopy effect, the schricks cams do have more lift, but they are a custom grind and are not listed in their catalouge, which also makes me wonder about the design or if this guy has the correct cams installed.
If there was a vacuum leak the car would be running terrible and would probably trip a CEL.
FYI your car is idling too high if it is at 500RPM when its up to operating temps. Pay closer attention to the tach. Look at the attachment, the line at idle is more like 225-350 RPM.
OK, sounds cool then, somebody post some dyno before and after runs.
Iwill have to check my rpm again when fully warmed up, that picture looks a little low almost stalled, was that car tuned or something?
Originally Posted by MMZ_TimeLord
I too would be curious about dyno numbers before and after with just the cams changed on a stock motor. Then a before and after with the Schrick cams and stock ECU to a tuned ECU. Then with a bigger pulley... then another ECU tune... etc.
Baby steps ... I've seen this done by a tuner before and he logged all the changes.
Baby steps ... I've seen this done by a tuner before and he logged all the changes.
Originally Posted by 240M3SRT
We can only count on our members testing. Even at a shops cost it gets very expensive and time consuming just to prove a point, and it doesnt always increase sales proportionately. After intake, pulley and ecu the cams seems like one of the next logical mods to me. Still waiting to see what the LET headers do...
Originally Posted by msheredy
FYI your car is idling too high if it is at 500RPM when its up to operating temps. Pay closer attention to the tach. Look at the attachment, the line at idle is more like 225-350 RPM.
Originally Posted by Maxwell
I don't think so man.. I drove my car for 30 minutes, and it won't drop below 500rpm, your info is incorrect
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cjw
Wheels, Brakes, Tires and Suspension
2
Oct 26, 2015 10:26 PM
ala_xfire
Audio, Video and Electronics
3
Sep 28, 2015 05:51 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)



