Originally Posted by bmorgan
I would go on, but most people on here are well aware of all the other inaccuracies that you have stated.
I'll point one out.
Originally Posted by Teck-9
The Cayman is my favorite Porsche, but the S still is not as rigid as even a base XF.
There's one. The base and the N/A (possibly the SRT6, but don't quote me on that) have all the same structural rigidity. The only thing the base doesn't have that the N/A does is leather heated seats, a subwoofer, silver trim, two-tone colors, TPMS... and that's all I can think of right now.
Other than that, this thread is just a lot of misinformation, bragging, and complaining.
But yes, the XF is one of the most structurally rigid cars in the world. I have the article somewhere, but Chrysler I think stated that the car has more structural rigidity than an Abrams tank.