View Single Post
Old Sep 7, 2005 | 12:13 PM
  #22 (permalink)  
kmag50's Avatar
kmag50
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: Findlay, Ohio
Default Re: Why Crossfire???

Originally Posted by kmarei
better question is why not crossfire?

350Z looks good, great engine, crappy build quality.
new SLK, too expensive but nice.
Mustang, you must be kidding, solid rear axle = tractor, crappy and cheap build quality.
the crossfire has no direct competitors in my opinion.
and ignore people that say it's not a sports car.
anything that is that low, 2 seater, with 0 - 60 in 6.5 is a sports car whether you like it or not.
just because some cars are faster doesn't mean this one is so bad.
more torque than boxster or Z4.
Your exactly right...couldn't have said it better...I still think this sweet little car gets somehow put to the side and forgotten about. I know this has been said a million times, but if more people knew of the car, drove the car and were better informed about the great prices offered on it right now, then you would definitely see an increase in sales. The new SLK is nice, but way too expensive for me. Mustang is a really sharp car but it is a Ford...enough said. The 350Z to me is not a good looking car...had one park next to my Crossfire a few days ago and it definitely is not attractive in my eyes. Feel the same way about the Z4...just not a good design.
 
Reply