This thread is fast approaching redundancy...
Cliff notes, for those that keep asking the same questions over and over and over:
- Yes, the NW Dual CAI is worth the extra $$$ over the single, if you can afford it
- Yes, the NW single will give you 90% as much power as dual for 50% of $$$
- Yes, the stock SRT does 0-100km/h (0-60 mph) in ~5 seconds
- Yes, you will be faster by using the CAI
- arado is a clown
As for the AMG/SRT d!ck-swinging that always takes place every ten threads or so,
I'm really confused why we have to keep having this argument. While the AMG is always touted as "superior", it got its *** handed to it 99% of the time by an SRT with equal mods. Blame the driver, blame the tires, blame the tune, bla bla bla... Fact remains, Steve had one of the fastest (if not THE fastest) SLK in the USA, and it was still bested by a local SRT-6 on a number of occasions. Steve got an occasional win, normally when Anthony's car was feeling ill. The scene was similar across the US... "Superior" on paper is simply a theory. When both cars lined up at the race track, the SRT usually beat the AMG.
The SLK AMG gets a lot of respect from me, but aside from the Vario Roof, I wouldn't have one over the SRT. No way, no chance.
Not an attack on anyone, as Steve and Anthony are both close friends and I support them (and their cars) 100%. And the argument *should* be dead, as Steve has moved on to more powerful, more expensive cars... but he still hangs out here because he secretly loves the SRT-6 and those that own them
Cheers,