Originally Posted by
Steve Jr
Well....tell us about it!

All positives with no ill effects, we first tried using even larger throttle bodies but that caused drivability issues we were not able to resolve... = no good for a street car. This throttle body is solved and remains happy with the ecu and allows the DCAI to exploit its abilities. i have not dynoed it yet and probably will not as every time we install it we do more to the car than just the throttle body itself as so much needs to come off the car that we always end up porting the s/c runners and such at the same time.
Originally Posted by philosophico
So what are the major benefits on a blown application? I know what an larger TB does on NA cars as as I have one my viper v10. As this is my only blower car are the benefits the same?
Also, thank you NW for your support on this platform, without you this platform would have died years ago.
reduced restriction and ability to feed more air/oxygen, yes, same benefits blown versus naturally aspirated. larger bore means less air friction and thus lower temps as well. all around good-ness.
thank you, and thank you for supporting us! we have more up our sleeves yet
Originally Posted by Da55id
Ditto!! Would love to know if there's dyno testing of the new crossover intake manifolds and this new throttle body...
we installed both onto a customers car here and will have pretty datalog graphs once the roads clear, in progress of another 10" of snow here today
Originally Posted by performanceisland
They have info posted on their site, except what is the mb part number for the 83mm throttle body for those sourcing it themselves?
as has been furnished to anyone who has asked, a2731410325
Originally Posted by paintergman
Will the ECU need to be tuned in order for the idle and drivability to remain civil or is this a bolt on affair. That is a huge increase in airflow and with a CAI you should be looking at a serious increase in HP.
ECU and drivability remains happy
Originally Posted by onehundred80
The write up on your site says an increase in volume, surely that should be an increase in area?
sure, well both, thank you for the correction, i will edit it for you.