Guys

I think we own second generation Crossfires. I ran across this picture the other day, it looks like Nash was 50 years ahead of its time.

 

You're joking aren't you?

 

I'm joking? You're kidding about my joking aren't you? I mean this ain't no Hudson, but it sill has a certain ... something, the word escapes me at the moment.

Just because it's ugly that is no reason to bash the Nash.

 

The tail pipes are in the right place????

 

yeah, and that one didn't sell any better than the second one. although I'm sure there is a devoted car forum out there devoted to that first iteration.

 

1949 NASH automobiles
Ford Miller Company
NASH Automobile Dealership
Toledo, Ohio
ca. 1949
10”x8” Black & White photograph

Click on the picture to enlarge.

 

I see it

 

I was gonna say you're trying to hard to find similarities, but it does have three very similar things:
1. The tailpipes.
2. That back window. HA.
3. If you look closely at the first picture, you can see a spine running down the rear under the window.

As far as similarities go, that's all I would give this car points for.

 

That's an aftermarket exhaust on that car. If you look its been redone, its not a stock Nash.
Pat

 

If you want to see something interesting,,check out the rear end of a 1948 Tucker

 

No guys, seriously, more like this