Crossfire SRT6 A place to discuss SRT-6 specific topics.

Turbo vs SC Comparison

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 04:08 AM
  #1 (permalink)  
lacerdaschoon's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Forum Regular
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 340
Likes: 1
From: Australia
Default Turbo vs SC Comparison

I wanted to learn which performs better under cooler conditions. Is there any difference between the two in that regard or will both see equal gains in cooler weather?
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 05:58 AM
  #2 (permalink)  
REVIT93RX7's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 372
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Default Re: Turbo vs SC Comparison

IAT's are the key to running better. The cooler air is more dense and can create a bigger volume in the combustion chamber. So that is a hard question to answer. There are various IC options for Turbo and not so many options for our water to air IC in our car.
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 07:18 AM
  #3 (permalink)  
LantanaTX's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,084
Likes: 8
From: Lantana, Republic of Texas
Default Re: Turbo vs SC Comparison

Originally Posted by REVIT93RX7
IAT's are the key to running better. The cooler air is more dense and can create a bigger volume in the combustion chamber. So that is a hard question to answer. There are various IC options for Turbo and not so many options for our water to air IC in our car.
Like he said, the colder the better for each system. When you compress air it gets hot. I think roots type blowers heat soak more than a turbo becuase they are usually mounted right on the engine. There are other differences as well between how they perform. A roots type blower (like on the SRT) give great power and torque from idle up and feel like you have a larger engine under the hood. Turbos and centrifigul super chagers (like Votec) can give better top end preformance and can usually show higher HP numbers. For normal street driving I prefer a super charger since it is instant and works better in the lower RPM range and produces better low end torque. To get the best of both worlds I have seen people twin charge their engines with a roots style s/c and turbo or two turbos of different sizes.
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 09:04 AM
  #4 (permalink)  
sonoronos's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,060
Likes: 2
From: Fairfax, VA
Default Re: Turbo vs SC Comparison

Originally Posted by lacerdaschoon
I wanted to learn which performs better under cooler conditions. Is there any difference between the two in that regard or will both see equal gains in cooler weather?
Are you talking about Brake Specific Fuel Consumption? A supercharger will have a lower BSFC than a turbo system at low boost/airflow. Turbos can be significantly more efficient overall, however.
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 11:41 AM
  #5 (permalink)  
ACRucrazy's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 543
Likes: 2
Default Re: Turbo vs SC Comparison

I would say in our application a Turbo for the simple fact no one would stick an intercooler in the valley of the block...
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 02:17 PM
  #6 (permalink)  
Mimi05SRT6's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 5
From: Orlando, FL
Default Re: Turbo vs SC Comparison

^^ Yea, what he said! ^^
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 03:08 PM
  #7 (permalink)  
BlackBeauty's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Default Re: Turbo vs SC Comparison

A turbo will make more power pound for pound then all factory roots blowers and most aftermarket blowers.
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 04:04 PM
  #8 (permalink)  
lacerdaschoon's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Forum Regular
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 340
Likes: 1
From: Australia
Default Re: Turbo vs SC Comparison

Basicly this topic came up with a couple friends, we are coming towards the end of summer here and they believe with their turbo cars they have more to gain in winter than the SRT. I wanted to know if it was significant enough to change the outcome between our cars once we hit winter here and the temp drop?
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 08:45 PM
  #9 (permalink)  
LantanaTX's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,084
Likes: 8
From: Lantana, Republic of Texas
Default Re: Turbo vs SC Comparison

Originally Posted by lacerdaschoon
Basicly this topic came up with a couple friends, we are coming towards the end of summer here and they believe with their turbo cars they have more to gain in winter than the SRT. I wanted to know if it was significant enough to change the outcome between our cars once we hit winter here and the temp drop?
I think the SRT would show more improvement in cold weather since my experience from owning both turbo'd and supercharged cars is the s/c cars get hurt more in hot weather so they have more to gain in cold weather.
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 11:45 PM
  #10 (permalink)  
antonio311's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Default Re: Turbo vs SC Comparison

A turbo will pick up more & better performance gains in cold temperatures. basically what the turbine does, is it forces the compressed air into the cylinder so more air means more fuel which means better performance. The colder the air the more compressed it is and the turbine can then pack even more air in the cylinder. The intercooler can also be used to cool the incoming air for more performance.


remember all turbos have lag, the time it takes the engine to to pump the air into the cylinder when u press the gas down.

Since the supercharger is mechanical there's no lag.

Turbos also save much more fuel than superchargers, becuse the engine mostly only uses the turbo when u accelerate hard. And the supercharger is always engaged, unlike the turbo.

At least that's what I think I learned when I worked my Turbo GLH, Lebaron turbo and my little knowlege of superchargers.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 01:02 AM
  #11 (permalink)  
cruzinquick's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 4
From: AZ
Default Re: Turbo vs SC Comparison

Why not add a turbo or two to your SC engine. http://www.hellionpowersystems.com/data.twinturbo.html
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 03:34 AM
  #12 (permalink)  
jturkel's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 405
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix/Scottsdale
Default Re: Turbo vs SC Comparison

Originally Posted by antonio311
Turbos also save much more fuel than superchargers, becuse the engine mostly only uses the turbo when u accelerate hard. And the supercharger is always engaged, unlike the turbo.
uhh......no....our supercharger is NOT always engaged
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 07:14 AM
  #13 (permalink)  
TemjinX2's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Default Re: Turbo vs SC Comparison

Originally Posted by antonio311
A turbo will pick up more & better performance gains in cold temperatures. basically what the turbine does, is it forces the compressed air into the cylinder so more air means more fuel which means better performance. The colder the air the more compressed it is and the turbine can then pack even more air in the cylinder. The intercooler can also be used to cool the incoming air for more performance.


remember all turbos have lag, the time it takes the engine to to pump the air into the cylinder when u press the gas down.

Since the supercharger is mechanical there's no lag.

Turbos also save much more fuel than superchargers, becuse the engine mostly only uses the turbo when u accelerate hard. And the supercharger is always engaged, unlike the turbo.

At least that's what I think I learned when I worked my Turbo GLH, Lebaron turbo and my little knowlege of superchargers.

if you have a srt6 then you should know your stock supercharger doesnt engage until it hits 2900rpm or above. It also engages below 2900rpm if there 44% of engine load or more. So anything below 2900rpm or 44% engine load the supercharger isn't engaged at all.

Also one of the reasons why you can get good hwy mileage. I've gotten as high as 27mpg in my c32 when it was stock...when the epa rating is 22mpg.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 07:20 AM
  #14 (permalink)  
TemjinX2's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Default Re: Turbo vs SC Comparison

to answer the op question. with everything equal..the turbo will show more power since turbos are more efficient in terms of producing hp. There both FI, ones run by the crank of the engine the other is powered by exhaust gases.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 08:12 AM
  #15 (permalink)  
LantanaTX's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,084
Likes: 8
From: Lantana, Republic of Texas
Default Re: Turbo vs SC Comparison

Over the years I have owned various cars and been involved on different forums and this debate always comes up. I have owned both turbo'd and s/c cars. On the dyno the turbo wins but for a street driven car I prefer a s/c. Turbos are great if your driving style is foot to the floor. For normal street driving a s/c will give boost instantly and even when you are just easing into the throttle from a dead stop. A s/c gives very linear boost. A s/c feels like you just have a much larger engine while a turbo feels weak until you get on the gas. To get the best of both worlds, I have seen people add a turbo to a super charged engine.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 10:18 AM
  #16 (permalink)  
REVIT93RX7's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 372
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Default Re: Turbo vs SC Comparison

My 93RX7 is a sequential twin turbo. There is no lag pressing the gas results in intant power. At 4000 RPM the switch happens to open the waste gate for the second turbo and the rush continues all the way to redline. Amazing engineering!
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 12:09 PM
  #17 (permalink)  
LantanaTX's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,084
Likes: 8
From: Lantana, Republic of Texas
Default Re: Turbo vs SC Comparison

Originally Posted by REVIT93RX7
My 93RX7 is a sequential twin turbo. There is no lag pressing the gas results in intant power. At 4000 RPM the switch happens to open the waste gate for the second turbo and the rush continues all the way to redline. Amazing engineering!
Twin turbos (a small one and a larger one) is another way to have the low end power of a s/c and the top end potential of a turbo. Most aftermarket turbo kits only use a single turbo. Given the choice of a single turbo or a s/c, I personally prefer the s/c for normal driving because there is more torque when just crusiing the streets. Torque is what you feel when you take off from a stop and torque is what gets the car moving. that is why a s/c equipped car just feels like a larger engine. If I only drove on a dyno or didn't care about speeding tickets, I would go with the turbo.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 04:05 PM
  #18 (permalink)  
msheredy's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 953
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
Default Re: Turbo vs SC Comparison

Originally Posted by TemjinX2
if you have a srt6 then you should know your stock supercharger doesnt engage until it hits 2900rpm or above.
Originally Posted by jturkel
uhh......no....our supercharger is NOT always engaged
Waldig pretty much proved that our supercharger is on 90% of the time (when the car is moving of course).

Thread here
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 09:18 PM
  #19 (permalink)  
TemjinX2's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Default Re: Turbo vs SC Comparison

Originally Posted by msheredy
Waldig pretty much proved that our supercharger is on 90% of the time (when the car is moving of course).

Thread here
its basically engages at 2900rpm or 44% throttle which ever comes first.

the supercharger being on 90% of the time is fine since most of the time your accerlating, which doesn't save any gas anyways.

He even saids at the end of the video at 3:57 time frame if you coast for 30seconds it turns off the supercharger. I'm sure MB believed if your coasting for that long, so basically no or little throttle your on a long highway with little traffic, so dont neeed all that power to accerlate and turns off the supercharger to save gas.

My original point was to contend to the other poster that our superchargers are not on all the time and more then likely probably won't save any more or any less gas then a turbo.

Turbos usually save gas because when your cruising at highway speeds your at a really low rpm and out of boost. Same with the supercharger, at least with ours since its basically turned off at highway crusing speeds.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 09:31 PM
  #20 (permalink)  
Illegal Machine's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 430
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Default Re: Turbo vs SC Comparison

This thread doesn't make much sense. It all depends on the car. If you have a fantastic intercooler, you're NOT going to see tons of gains from colder weather because your car is already built to resist the heat.

If you have zero cooling mods, then your car is going to run worse in the summer, but gave a bigger gain when it gets cold.

If your car is gaining TONS of power when it gets cold, that more than likely means you have a junk set up, because your car isn't prepared for high temps.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
amx1397
Other Vehicles
5
Jul 24, 2020 09:25 AM
zackman62
Crossfire Coupe
52
Nov 6, 2015 12:37 PM
grip grip
Other Cars Etc
7
Sep 26, 2015 09:52 PM
MI1XFIRE
All Crossfires
9
Aug 2, 2015 11:05 AM
waldig
All Crossfires
7
Jul 20, 2015 08:10 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:51 PM.