SRT6 article, all wrong again
I read this article on the web this morning, it is supposed to be about the SRT6, of all the pictures in the article only one is an SRT. The usual mistakes and to top it of the cars specifications quoted are the NA. What a pile of rubbish.
https://www.uniquechrysler.com/blog/...ossfire-srt-6/
https://www.uniquechrysler.com/blog/...ossfire-srt-6/
This is just another example of an author/website that DID NOT do any research on this subject. The only legitimate review of the Crossfire SRT6 was produced by the Chrysler Crossfire management team that created our cars, known as the SRT6 Story, located on this forum. There is NO need to mull over any other articles by clueless authors.
R E L A X....
Dennis
DTMenace
R E L A X....
Dennis
DTMenace
This is just another example of an author/website that DID NOT do any research on this subject. The only legitimate review of the Crossfire SRT6 was produced by the Chrysler Crossfire management team that created our cars, known as the SRT6 Story, located on this forum. There is NO need to mull over any other articles by clueless authors.
R E L A X....
Dennis
DTMenace
R E L A X....
Dennis
DTMenace
I was at a customer appreciation day at Indianapolis raceway park wednesday. We were allowed on the track so I took the coupe. All kinds of cars showed up. Bottom line the crossfire fit right in. Ran head to head with a zl1 Camaro and out ran many other production cars there that day. Had a p108 code pop up but ran great all day. Hasn’t been to a track in 12 years. Needs to go to Rudy when he has time. Going to look at the tune and see if we can get it to shift quicker. I like mid 11’s out of it 11.7 11.8 all day. They just didn’t put any effort into this car because Daimler pulled the plug.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)



