spoiler - form follows function?
Originally Posted by RickB
I got out my old textbooks, and I guess my memory isn't what it used to be. Yes, the drag is a function of the velocity squared.
I had a quick look a NASA site with a simple model function - seems easy to make the figures match 40 lb using a plate as opposed to a wing - perhaps too easy.
Separation of airflow is important to consider. As well as providing downforce with a wing the spoiler function could be forming turbulence in the join of airflows over and under the car, so reducing the lift generated by the cars shape.
NASA Foil calc site http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/foil2.html
Originally Posted by typhoon55
It also may shed light as to the fixed srt version...it is not worth putting a activated wing as the speeds are potentially greater. (of course for the SRT price tag they could of put a stronger motor)
Also a consideration - the deeper front spoiler on the SRT will alter the aerodynamics, perhaps requiring the larger area of the fixed wing. I know some testing on the Subaru STI and WRX's showed mismatched wings and front spoilers could great lift at the front and significantly increased downforce at the back as opposed to an equal increase in downforce at the front and back. Imagine that scenario when overtaking at high speed one of those new 40 ft trailers with aerodynamic side skirts and little wheels.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
davidc90
Troubleshooting & Technical Questions & Modifications
2
Sep 6, 2015 10:37 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)



