Has anyone else noticed this?
Has anyone else noticed this?
I was looking at the exhaut under my co-workers SRT Roadster the other day and noticed something I hadn't previously seen on my car.
Beneath his car, there is a cross brace connected to the frame just under the doors, and back across to the rear of the car, making a 'V'. This is absent on the Coupe model.
I'm not sure if others have noticed this or not...but it could be helpful for any of the road race guys to install this roadster's brace onto the coupe to help stiffen up the chassis even more.
Thought it was worth mentioning...although I'm sure HDDP will say it was already posted 3 years ago.
SQ
Beneath his car, there is a cross brace connected to the frame just under the doors, and back across to the rear of the car, making a 'V'. This is absent on the Coupe model.
I'm not sure if others have noticed this or not...but it could be helpful for any of the road race guys to install this roadster's brace onto the coupe to help stiffen up the chassis even more.
Thought it was worth mentioning...although I'm sure HDDP will say it was already posted 3 years ago.
SQ
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Mateo, CA, USA, Earth, Sol, Milkyway
Age: 55
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes
on
11 Posts
Re: Has anyone else noticed this?
Originally Posted by ShawnQ
there is a cross brace connected to the frame just under the doors, and back across to the rear of the car, making a 'V'.
Re: Has anyone else noticed this?
Originally Posted by MMZ_TimeLord
Yep, the V bracing is on my coupe as well. So, for the convertible... no... for the SRT6 to stiffen an already stiff chassis... YES!
(Coupe)
Fflores, yes I know it is because it is a vert - but it could add even MORE to your car if your car doesn't have them, and you so desire...(and like paying your dentist and kideny doctor )
SQ
Re: Has anyone else noticed this?
Originally Posted by ShawnQ
You are saying your car DOES have them? From the factory...strange, mine does not.
(Coupe)
Fflores, yes I know it is because it is a vert - but it could add even MORE to your car if your car doesn't have them, and you so desire...(and like paying your dentist and kideny doctor )
SQ
(Coupe)
Fflores, yes I know it is because it is a vert - but it could add even MORE to your car if your car doesn't have them, and you so desire...(and like paying your dentist and kideny doctor )
SQ
Re: Has anyone else noticed this?
It's nice to hear that they are still using old "Muscle Car" technology even on today's cars.
On all the XF convertibles, it's there to help prevent the body from "flexing" thanks to the solid roof being removed and causing structural integrity issues.
On the already "ultra" stiff coupes, I believe it's there to help keep the bodies from "twisting" due to the massive torque of the AMG engine.
Back in the 60's G.M. used it's convertible style "Boxed" frame under their GTO, 442, Grand Sport, and SS 396 Chevelles for the same reason.
Cars with "uni-body" construction are less prone to "flex" simply because it's a much stronger design principle. But even as strong as it is, Chrysler would reinforce their "Hemi" cars, especially the Cuda and Challengers, to resist "twisting" caused by those motors.
In the future, those of you who own SRT's, and do a lot of drag racing, or simply a lot of "hole shots" across intersections, could notice slight "stress" marks appearing on your rear 1/4 panels. Nothing dramatic, or obvious, but very subtle imperfections that probably only you will notice under certain lighting conditions. Don't worry about it, nobody else will probably ever notice them, and as long as your car smokes the tires it may never occur. It usually only happens when racers start using "sticky" tires that "hook up" and all that kinetic energy has to be absorbed somewhere. Your drive train receives the brunt of it, but the rest is transmitted to the body.
On all the XF convertibles, it's there to help prevent the body from "flexing" thanks to the solid roof being removed and causing structural integrity issues.
On the already "ultra" stiff coupes, I believe it's there to help keep the bodies from "twisting" due to the massive torque of the AMG engine.
Back in the 60's G.M. used it's convertible style "Boxed" frame under their GTO, 442, Grand Sport, and SS 396 Chevelles for the same reason.
Cars with "uni-body" construction are less prone to "flex" simply because it's a much stronger design principle. But even as strong as it is, Chrysler would reinforce their "Hemi" cars, especially the Cuda and Challengers, to resist "twisting" caused by those motors.
In the future, those of you who own SRT's, and do a lot of drag racing, or simply a lot of "hole shots" across intersections, could notice slight "stress" marks appearing on your rear 1/4 panels. Nothing dramatic, or obvious, but very subtle imperfections that probably only you will notice under certain lighting conditions. Don't worry about it, nobody else will probably ever notice them, and as long as your car smokes the tires it may never occur. It usually only happens when racers start using "sticky" tires that "hook up" and all that kinetic energy has to be absorbed somewhere. Your drive train receives the brunt of it, but the rest is transmitted to the body.
Last edited by +fireamx; 11-15-2007 at 07:37 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
blackpepper
Troubleshooting & Technical Questions & Modifications
8
10-04-2017 06:09 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)