SRT6 Dyno
Scott - You are running a little rich on the bottom end. You can add .5 to the A/F when the tail pipe sniffer (O2 Sensor) is used.
5.50 and up looks good.
I like that the trq curve is flat.
Want to send it back in for a few minor adjustments?
5.50 and up looks good.
I like that the trq curve is flat.
Want to send it back in for a few minor adjustments?
Originally Posted by amg-jerry
Scott - You are running a little rich on the bottom end. You can add .5 to the A/F when the tail pipe sniffer (O2 Sensor) is used.
5.50 and up looks good.
I like that the trq curve is flat.
Want to send it back in for a few minor adjustments?
5.50 and up looks good.
I like that the trq curve is flat.
Want to send it back in for a few minor adjustments?
Originally Posted by MikeR
I just had my Aero dyno'd a week ago on a Mustang and it was 308 whp max and 315 wtq max. It was also 96 degrees out so the readings were a little low. I will have to take it back for a cool morning dyno. I have the SL55 intake, 181 and LET tune. On the DynoJet I would think you would be better than 328whp also. My charts were nice even lines all the way through.
MikeR
MikeR
I was able to put the Crossfire on a different dyno on Saturday to attempt to help 240M3SRT trouble shoot the odd spike in HP and A/F we saw the last time we dyno’ed the cars. I am finding that the read outs can change fairly dramatically with the different settings of the dyno operator. I see from my first time out that the dyno operator ran the Dyno in MPH apposed to RPM, I also see that he had it set at STD opposed to SAE. I found a difference in the “smoothing” factor as well from 3 to 0. The first operator ran the car up to 150mph on the dyno where the second operator just punched it in 3rd and basically had it up to 120.
The 2nd dyno run was a little hotter outside, 96 compared to 89 so I netted a different result. I have attached 2 graphs to look at. The first is the 3 runs from 8/23/08 and the second is a graph of the best fun from 8/15/08 with the best run from 8/25/08 in the same format that the first dyno operator mapped out. As you can see, there is a 7hp difference in just the format and another 7hp difference between the 2 runs. I guess that is what 7 degrees will do??
Let be the first to say that I have no idea what all this means, other than the A/F spike I believe is a factor of the first dyno operator and is not related to the cars.
The 2nd dyno run was a little hotter outside, 96 compared to 89 so I netted a different result. I have attached 2 graphs to look at. The first is the 3 runs from 8/23/08 and the second is a graph of the best fun from 8/15/08 with the best run from 8/25/08 in the same format that the first dyno operator mapped out. As you can see, there is a 7hp difference in just the format and another 7hp difference between the 2 runs. I guess that is what 7 degrees will do??
Let be the first to say that I have no idea what all this means, other than the A/F spike I believe is a factor of the first dyno operator and is not related to the cars.
Last edited by BLKFIN; Aug 25, 2008 at 06:53 PM.
Originally Posted by 240M3SRT
Scott are you sure G2 didnt dyno in 3rd gear because based on the graphs thats how it looks?
My first time at a dyno was the same as yours, meaning about them not knowing what to do. All they could muster was hp without torque and a/f readings! I'm going out to another shop on Sep. 14th and I'll give them the info that I've learned on here on how to dyno.
Those some very respectable numbers, but it would appear that whoever was running the dyno didn't know too much...
If you want the most accurate numbers, it needs to be CF: Smoothing 5 and be measured in SAE.
If you want the most accurate numbers, it needs to be CF: Smoothing 5 and be measured in SAE.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
johnnycross413
Troubleshooting & Technical Questions & Modifications
1
Mar 4, 2016 04:49 AM
rogerlemoine
WTB - Items/Parts Wanted to Buy - Archive
3
Oct 26, 2015 12:02 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)




