Crossfire SRT6 A place to discuss SRT-6 specific topics.

Exhaust size:Correct me if i'm wrong.

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 05:53 PM
  #1 (permalink)  
j-fire's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Forum Regular
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 689
Likes: 3
From: iowa.
Default Exhaust size:Correct me if i'm wrong.

okay, seeing all the variations of exhausts on here, and with our own miserable attempts at making a more 'potent' exhaust, i was mulling something over....

in high powered SINGLE exhaust cars running boost like Toyota supras, STi's etc.... i most commonly see SINGLE 3" exhaust upgrades.

NOW. if we were running TRUE DUALS on our boosted SRT's, doesn't building 2.5" exhaust on EACH side actually equate to 5" of exhaust??? and is this an incorrect statement?

wouldn't maybe something more tame such as 2" exhaust on each side with no cats provide a better "BALANCE" of power delivery?

i mean, if AMG fitted us with a single 2.75" single exhaust from the factory, (which equates to 1.37" per side) and still allows for a lot of power, are we all getting too greedy with the exhaust volume?
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 06:02 PM
  #2 (permalink)  
Punkin's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
From: NorthEast
Default Re: Exhaust size:Correct me if i'm wrong.

Interesting question. Maybe Professor Waldig or another educated motorhead can answer your well thought question. I hope to get whatever exhaust I end up with before I get my custom tune so I can take advantage of the changes. Does that make sense?
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 06:20 PM
  #3 (permalink)  
c32AMG-DTM's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: Philly, PA
Default Re: Exhaust size:Correct me if i'm wrong.

Originally Posted by j-fire
okay, seeing all the variations of exhausts on here, and with our own miserable attempts at making a more 'potent' exhaust, i was mulling something over....

in high powered SINGLE exhaust cars running boost like Toyota supras, STi's etc.... i most commonly see SINGLE 3" exhaust upgrades.

NOW. if we were running TRUE DUALS on our boosted SRT's, doesn't building 2.5" exhaust on EACH side actually equate to 5" of exhaust??? and is this an incorrect statement?

wouldn't maybe something more tame such as 2" exhaust on each side with no cats provide a better "BALANCE" of power delivery?

i mean, if AMG fitted us with a single 2.75" single exhaust from the factory, (which equates to 1.37" per side) and still allows for a lot of power, are we all getting too greedy with the exhaust volume?
I believe that to, in fact, be an incorrect statement. The cross-section area of the tube would be pi*r^2. 3.14 * 1.25 * 1.25 = 4.91 inches of area. So, duals would be 9.8125" of total area. By comparison, 3.14 * 2.5 * 2.5 = 19.625" of total area. In conclusion, the single 5" exhaust tube would flow WAY more than two 2.5" exhaust tubes.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 06:25 PM
  #4 (permalink)  
Bulldogger's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 665
Likes: 1
Default Re: Exhaust size:Correct me if i'm wrong.

another problem may be building the exhaust and then dynoing. You may need to leave the exhaust on for a while to allow the ECU to start making corrections
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 06:33 PM
  #5 (permalink)  
Punkin's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
From: NorthEast
Default Re: Exhaust size:Correct me if i'm wrong.

See, ask you shall receive! Kinda above my paygrade as the ole' pres says.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 09:00 PM
  #6 (permalink)  
j-fire's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Forum Regular
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 689
Likes: 3
From: iowa.
Default Re: Exhaust size:Correct me if i'm wrong.

Originally Posted by c32AMG-DTM
I believe that to, in fact, be an incorrect statement. The cross-section area of the tube would be pi*r^2. 3.14 * 1.25 * 1.25 = 4.91 inches of area. So, duals would be 9.8125" of total area. By comparison, 3.14 * 2.5 * 2.5 = 19.625" of total area. In conclusion, the single 5" exhaust tube would flow WAY more than two 2.5" exhaust tubes.
but.... is that necessarily a GOOD thing? seems like we may be getting too much flow.

much of tuning is like making a cake; too much of an ingredient, it's ruined. too little of an ingredient, it's ruined.

again, why aren't we seeing turbo-supras running 4-5" exhausts? i've seen numerous with 700-800hp supras with 3" single exhausts.

thoughts?
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 09:26 PM
  #7 (permalink)  
240M3SRT's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 0
Default Re: Exhaust size:Correct me if i'm wrong.

Originally Posted by j-fire
but.... is that necessarily a GOOD thing? seems like we may be getting too much flow.

much of tuning is like making a cake; too much of an ingredient, it's ruined. too little of an ingredient, it's ruined.

again, why aren't we seeing turbo-supras running 4-5" exhausts? i've seen numerous with 700-800hp supras with 3" single exhausts.

thoughts?
Turbos are different than s/c's, a single turbo supra will benefit from a 4" exhaust more than a 3".

But that is an interesting cake comparison.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 09:53 PM
  #8 (permalink)  
sonoronos's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,060
Likes: 2
From: Fairfax, VA
Default Re: Exhaust size:Correct me if i'm wrong.

Originally Posted by c32AMG-DTM
I believe that to, in fact, be an incorrect statement. The cross-section area of the tube would be pi*r^2. 3.14 * 1.25 * 1.25 = 4.91 inches of area. So, duals would be 9.8125" of total area. By comparison, 3.14 * 2.5 * 2.5 = 19.625" of total area. In conclusion, the single 5" exhaust tube would flow WAY more than two 2.5" exhaust tubes.
Hagen-Poiseuille states that airflow through a tube is the fourth power of radius. This means that a 5" exhaust would flow 8x more gas than 2 2.5" exhaust tubes.

Don't ask me how to pronounce Poiseuille, I have no idea.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 11:01 PM
  #9 (permalink)  
GB'sXFire's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 262
Likes: 2
From: Los Angeles, (Whittier)
Default Re: Exhaust size:Correct me if i'm wrong.

My heads spinnin'! Get me a drink quick......and make it a double!
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 11:07 PM
  #10 (permalink)  
BrianBrave's Avatar
<--- Huge Horsepower
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,217
Likes: 2
From: So Cal
Default Re: Exhaust size:Correct me if i'm wrong.

Originally Posted by sonoronos
Hagen-Poiseuille states that airflow through a tube is the fourth power of radius. This means that a 5" exhaust would flow 8x more gas than 2 2.5" exhaust tubes.

Don't ask me how to pronounce Poiseuille, I have no idea.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Poiseuille's+law

Click the "Hear" button

Something about "homegenous fluid" VS ever-changing exhaust gas temperatures has me scratching my head....
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 11:52 PM
  #11 (permalink)  
ProjectMayhem's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 888
Likes: 1
From: St. Louis, MO
Default Re: Exhaust size:Correct me if i'm wrong.

Honestly any gains from exhaust "upgrades" are minor mostly its just a tone and volume preferance. I personaly kept the 2 cats, 2 resonators, and 3 way cat on, but removed the muffler and ran a Y-splitter out the back for a more agressive "muscle" sound and enjoy it very much.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 05:23 AM
  #12 (permalink)  
REVIT93RX7's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 372
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Default Re: Exhaust size:Correct me if i'm wrong.

I think exhaust size makes more of a difference on turbo cars than SC cars. In a turbo application you are trying to provide the right amount of back pressure, so as to get the most flow and less restriction in the exhaust. This should make the turbo more efficient.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 12:18 PM
  #13 (permalink)  
j-fire's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Forum Regular
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 689
Likes: 3
From: iowa.
Default Re: Exhaust size:Correct me if i'm wrong.

the point i'm trying to make, is perhaps we are trying to use too much 'larger' pipe, and maybe for a 'true dual exhaust' we should use 2" or 2.25" on both sides, instead of 3" on both sides! 3" of exhaust pipe on only 3 cylinder heads each side seems excessive, and maybe is not 'balancing' the power curve.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 07:13 PM
  #14 (permalink)  
c32AMG-DTM's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: Philly, PA
Default Re: Exhaust size:Correct me if i'm wrong.

Originally Posted by REVIT93RX7
I think exhaust size makes more of a difference on turbo cars than SC cars. In a turbo application you are trying to provide the right amount of back pressure, so as to get the most flow and less restriction in the exhaust. This should make the turbo more efficient.
Actually, you really don't need to consider backpressure all that much on ANY F/I engine, S/C'd or turbo'd - flow is significantly more important, AFAIK. N/A engines, different story... but the positive intake-side pressure for F/I engines is a different situation (within reason). YMMV, however
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 07:15 PM
  #15 (permalink)  
c32AMG-DTM's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: Philly, PA
Default Re: Exhaust size:Correct me if i'm wrong.

Originally Posted by j-fire
the point i'm trying to make, is perhaps we are trying to use too much 'larger' pipe, and maybe for a 'true dual exhaust' we should use 2" or 2.25" on both sides, instead of 3" on both sides! 3" of exhaust pipe on only 3 cylinder heads each side seems excessive, and maybe is not 'balancing' the power curve.
A large, cat-back exhaust on our cars probably isn't going to do much - the exhaust manifolds into stock cats will be the major restriction. Deal with that properly, and you'll probably notice more meaningful gains.
 
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 01:57 AM
  #16 (permalink)  
Mimi05SRT6's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 5
From: Orlando, FL
Default Re: Exhaust size:Correct me if i'm wrong.

Originally Posted by ProjectMayhem
I personaly kept the 2 resonators
That's weird...For some reason I only have 1 resonator on my car which came like that from the factory.
 

Last edited by Mimi05SRT6; Feb 19, 2009 at 01:59 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 09:34 AM
  #17 (permalink)  
Bulldogger's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 665
Likes: 1
Default Re: Exhaust size:Correct me if i'm wrong.

Originally Posted by Mimi05SRT6
That's weird...For some reason I only have 1 resonator on my car which came like that from the factory.
The two pre cats are resonators as well as the thing that looks like a small piece of luggage near the rear.
 
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 10:38 AM
  #18 (permalink)  
j-fire's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Forum Regular
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 689
Likes: 3
From: iowa.
Default Re: Exhaust size:Correct me if i'm wrong.

has anyone successfully deleted the front cats?
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TerryR
Cars For Sale - Archive
13
Dec 13, 2019 03:27 PM
cuziamninja
Crossfire Roadster
5
Oct 5, 2015 10:39 AM
Sweet2002
Crossfire SRT6
1
Sep 28, 2015 07:40 PM
Big_Country
Cars For Sale - Archive
3
Sep 22, 2015 03:47 PM
Idrenak
Parts/Accessories for sale - Archive
6
Sep 19, 2015 08:17 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:53 AM.