How did "Xfire" come about?
Crossfire. A cross to me is more like a " + " sign than an " X ". Cross-hairs are horizontal and vertical, not diagonal like an X. Can someone explain?
James
James
because hate typing things they feel are long multiple times. the shift and = just to get a + would be to much work, and xfire is much shorter
my guess haha but im just as lost as you, i think its better than calling our car an XF which is a jaguar
my guess haha but im just as lost as you, i think its better than calling our car an XF which is a jaguar
X is used for "cross" on traffic signs. Not a religious symbol it is the intersection or "crossing" point. Sign examples are
PED XING (PEDESTRIAN CROSSING)
RAILWAY XING
DEER XING
ETC.
There is a story that the "Cross" in Crossfire is symbolized on the side of the car where the two horizontal planes intesect (cross) on the door forming a X (cross).
PED XING (PEDESTRIAN CROSSING)
RAILWAY XING
DEER XING
ETC.
There is a story that the "Cross" in Crossfire is symbolized on the side of the car where the two horizontal planes intesect (cross) on the door forming a X (cross).
Last edited by SRT SIX; Sep 21, 2009 at 12:38 AM.
Originally Posted by James1549
Crossfire. A cross to me is more like a " + " sign than an " X ". Cross-hairs are horizontal and vertical, not diagonal like an X. Can someone explain?
James
James
I felt the same way as you James, hence the screen name (+fireamx), but after doing a little research (looking it up in the dictionary) turns out +, X, even the letter "t" (when displayed like the Crucifix) all are considered a "CROSS".
Last edited by +fireamx; Sep 21, 2009 at 07:02 PM.
Originally Posted by SRT SIX
There is a story that the "Cross" in Crossfire is symbolized on the side of the car where the two horizontal planes intesect (cross) on the door forming a X (cross).
FWIW
Historically, the original cross was an X, as in pictograms from neanderthal drawings and the like. The upright symetrical cross was used also, but as someone pointed out, the X was a universal sign of a crossing, whereas the symetrical + was meant as something else, an early sun sign, that transmuted to the "swastika" design for the sun.
Even the Romans got into the act, when they strung up prisoners they would make the X out of lumber and the prisoner would be splayed out on the X with all four limbs, where they were generally shot full with arrows as a target and then left to die. It was easier to build than the tree Cross depicted on crucifixions, as they didn't have to dig a hole to plant the one main support. Just needed a support in the back. Over time they got the idea of the upright cross that we all know, that would be more cruel and punishing and hence serve their purpose better. And now when we think of cross we mainly see the picture in our mind of the Christian version, and that is more cultural than anything. Another culture would more easily picture the X when the hear the word cross. A little known fact, there, Normie.
Even the Romans got into the act, when they strung up prisoners they would make the X out of lumber and the prisoner would be splayed out on the X with all four limbs, where they were generally shot full with arrows as a target and then left to die. It was easier to build than the tree Cross depicted on crucifixions, as they didn't have to dig a hole to plant the one main support. Just needed a support in the back. Over time they got the idea of the upright cross that we all know, that would be more cruel and punishing and hence serve their purpose better. And now when we think of cross we mainly see the picture in our mind of the Christian version, and that is more cultural than anything. Another culture would more easily picture the X when the hear the word cross. A little known fact, there, Normie.
Last edited by mdaniels4; Sep 25, 2009 at 11:52 AM.
Originally Posted by mdaniels4
Historically, the original cross was an X, as in pictograms from neanderthal drawings and the like. The upright symetrical cross was used also, but as someone pointed out, the X was a universal sign of a crossing, whereas the symetrical + was meant as something else, an early sun sign, that transmuted to the "swastika" design for the sun.
Originally Posted by mdaniels4
Even the Romans got into the act, when they strung up prisoners they would make the X out of lumber and the prisoner would be splayed out on the X with all four limbs, where they were generally shot full with arrows as a target and then left to die. It was easier to build than the tree Cross depicted on crucifictions, as they didn't have to dig a hole to plant the one main support. Just needed a support in the back. Over time they got the idea of the upright cross that we all know, that would be more cruel and punishing and hence serve their purpose better. And now when we think of cross we mainly see the picture in our mind of the Christian version, and that is more cultural than anything. Another culture would more easily picture the X when the hear the word cross. A little known fact, there, Normie.
Ouch! My poor little head. Not so early in the morning!
Well, Chevy has it's crossfire injection, and there is a crossfire snowmobile...so I don't know how MB+Chrysler came up with "XF"....maybe someone should ask the inventor...designer...
because they didn't want to call it AMX because to many people would think it of being a rambler but if you look at the specs of the AMX and the crossfire you would wonder why they didn't name it the AMX. read this
That would be the 1968=60 and 70 amx/----2004-2008 crossfire
and BY xfireamx
Can You Identify theses 2 Cars? - 11-25-2005 , 04:21 PM
_________________________1968 AMX_________2004 Crossfire__________
Seating Capacity______________2___________________2_______ _________
Wheel Base__________________97"_________________94.5"___ __________
FR.Track____________________59.7"________________5 8.3"_____________
R.Track_____________________57.0"________________5 8.2"_____________
Length______________________177.2"_______________1 59.8"____________
Height______________________51.7"________________5 1.4"_____________
Ground Clearance____________5.29"________________4.9"____ __________
Curb Weight________________3035 lbs._____________3084 lbs.__________
Weight Distribution F/R,%_____57/43________________54/46_____________
Trunk Space cu.ft.____________9.6__________________7.6________ ______
Turns Lock to Lock____________3.8__________________3.1__________ ____
Turning Circle________________33.5'_________________32.9__ ___________
Engine Compression Ratio______10.2:1________________10.0:1__________
SAE. H.P.____________________225__________________215__ ___________
Frontal Area sq.ft.____________20.6__________________20.6______ ______
Final Drive Ratio_____________3.15:1________________3.27:1____ _______
Body Construction____________Unitized_______________Uni tized_________
Steering___________________recirculating ball________recirculating ball___
Braking 60-0 m.p.h.__________115'__________________114'________ _____
Automatic Trans. Performance__Motor Trend____________Motor Trend_____
30 m.p.h.___________________2.9 sec.________________2.5 sec.________
60 m.p.h.___________________6.9 sec.________________7.1 sec.________
1/4 mile time & speed_______15.2 sec. 92 mph._____ 15.18 sec. 96 mph._
Manual Trans. Performance____Car & Driver____________Car & Driver_____
30 m.p.h.___________________1.9 sec.________________2.1 sec.________
40 m.p.h.___________________3.1 sec.________________3.5 sec.________
50 m.p.h.___________________4.5 sec.________________4.7 sec.________
60 m.p.h.___________________6.6 sec.________________6.5 sec.________
70 m.p.h.___________________8.5 sec.________________8.2 sec.________
80 m.p.h.___________________10.7 sec._______________10.2 sec._______
90 m.p.h.___________________13.5 sec._______________13.1 sec._______
100 m.p.h.__________________16.3 sec._______________16.1 sec._______
1/4 mile time & speed_______14.8 sec. 95 mph._________14.8 sec. 96 mph_
Modified AMX vs SRT-6_____13.18 sec. 107 mph.______13.3 sec. 107.5 mph___
Last edited by +fireamx : 11-26-2005 at 06:28 PM .
That would be the 1968=60 and 70 amx/----2004-2008 crossfire
and BY xfireamx
Can You Identify theses 2 Cars? - 11-25-2005 , 04:21 PM
_________________________1968 AMX_________2004 Crossfire__________
Seating Capacity______________2___________________2_______ _________
Wheel Base__________________97"_________________94.5"___ __________
FR.Track____________________59.7"________________5 8.3"_____________
R.Track_____________________57.0"________________5 8.2"_____________
Length______________________177.2"_______________1 59.8"____________
Height______________________51.7"________________5 1.4"_____________
Ground Clearance____________5.29"________________4.9"____ __________
Curb Weight________________3035 lbs._____________3084 lbs.__________
Weight Distribution F/R,%_____57/43________________54/46_____________
Trunk Space cu.ft.____________9.6__________________7.6________ ______
Turns Lock to Lock____________3.8__________________3.1__________ ____
Turning Circle________________33.5'_________________32.9__ ___________
Engine Compression Ratio______10.2:1________________10.0:1__________
SAE. H.P.____________________225__________________215__ ___________
Frontal Area sq.ft.____________20.6__________________20.6______ ______
Final Drive Ratio_____________3.15:1________________3.27:1____ _______
Body Construction____________Unitized_______________Uni tized_________
Steering___________________recirculating ball________recirculating ball___
Braking 60-0 m.p.h.__________115'__________________114'________ _____
Automatic Trans. Performance__Motor Trend____________Motor Trend_____
30 m.p.h.___________________2.9 sec.________________2.5 sec.________
60 m.p.h.___________________6.9 sec.________________7.1 sec.________
1/4 mile time & speed_______15.2 sec. 92 mph._____ 15.18 sec. 96 mph._
Manual Trans. Performance____Car & Driver____________Car & Driver_____
30 m.p.h.___________________1.9 sec.________________2.1 sec.________
40 m.p.h.___________________3.1 sec.________________3.5 sec.________
50 m.p.h.___________________4.5 sec.________________4.7 sec.________
60 m.p.h.___________________6.6 sec.________________6.5 sec.________
70 m.p.h.___________________8.5 sec.________________8.2 sec.________
80 m.p.h.___________________10.7 sec._______________10.2 sec._______
90 m.p.h.___________________13.5 sec._______________13.1 sec._______
100 m.p.h.__________________16.3 sec._______________16.1 sec._______
1/4 mile time & speed_______14.8 sec. 95 mph._________14.8 sec. 96 mph_
Modified AMX vs SRT-6_____13.18 sec. 107 mph.______13.3 sec. 107.5 mph___
Last edited by +fireamx : 11-26-2005 at 06:28 PM .
Here you go:
Chrysler Crossfire - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And you know-if you read it in Wiki, you can take it to the bank!
Chrysler Crossfire - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And you know-if you read it in Wiki, you can take it to the bank!
Originally Posted by CZMX
Wouldn't a "+" sign make it a Plusfire? I like the x, myself. Rusty...
I guess you've never seen the "Red Cross" logo.
American Red Cross: DONATE NOW!
I believe that the Xfire abbreviation originated on this forum. I remember a thread from very early on where we discussed what we should use. It came down to XF and xfire. Xfire just became the dominate usage. If I weren't so lazy I'd search for that original thread. Don't recall +fire ever being offered as a choice. Looks goofy to me.
In my #6 post I pointed out that the letter X, a + sign, and a lower case letter t can all be considered a cross according to Websters.
I don't believe anybody here is suggesting we start referring to the Crossfire as a +fire.
I thought it was a given that the Crossfire was called a CROSSfire because of the two body lines intersecting on the door of the car. (Maybe everybody didn't get the memo).
I fully agree an X does look cooler, (Malcom+) just wouldn't have made quite the impact.
In Chi-town, +fire may look goofy, but maybe it was just my Catholic upbringing that made me choose my screen name, who knows. But I'll bet if you give 100 random people a piece of paper (in this culture) and ask them to draw a cross on it, you'll wind up with a + more often than X everytime. (Except on Jay Walking).
For the record, I've owned 37 cars that ended in the letter "X" (useless info for sure) but I was the first to "rebadge" their Crossfire as an "X" too.
Except for Jim in Florida, I don't know anybody else who has.
I don't believe anybody here is suggesting we start referring to the Crossfire as a +fire.
I thought it was a given that the Crossfire was called a CROSSfire because of the two body lines intersecting on the door of the car. (Maybe everybody didn't get the memo).
I fully agree an X does look cooler, (Malcom+) just wouldn't have made quite the impact.
In Chi-town, +fire may look goofy, but maybe it was just my Catholic upbringing that made me choose my screen name, who knows. But I'll bet if you give 100 random people a piece of paper (in this culture) and ask them to draw a cross on it, you'll wind up with a + more often than X everytime. (Except on Jay Walking).
For the record, I've owned 37 cars that ended in the letter "X" (useless info for sure) but I was the first to "rebadge" their Crossfire as an "X" too.
Except for Jim in Florida, I don't know anybody else who has.
Last edited by +fireamx; Sep 28, 2009 at 09:01 AM.
Wow, don't we all just love our little red headed stepchildren?
Like everyone has an a$$hole, we all have opinions. While not necessarily expressed with hurtful intent, because our babies seem to bring our emotions to the surface, we sometimes take comments personally.
To keep this from happening, I propose we choose an unpronounceable symbol to represent "the car formerly known as XFire." LMAO
Like everyone has an a$$hole, we all have opinions. While not necessarily expressed with hurtful intent, because our babies seem to bring our emotions to the surface, we sometimes take comments personally.
To keep this from happening, I propose we choose an unpronounceable symbol to represent "the car formerly known as XFire." LMAO


