Best Radar Detector Install EVER!
Originally Posted by jonnyangel04
Now the best part about is IT is perfectly legal in most states to jam lasers.
Originally Posted by bobs
Negative. The FCC prohibits using devices that jam (intentionally or orhterwise) other signals. Get gaught with it and you're goin' down.
Originally Posted by DanielNTX
Actually jamming lasers is okay.
To all the Virginia Crossfire owqners - could you imagine getting caught with this equip. in your car and breaking the +20mph barrier, speeding, reckless driving fines and this - the fines would almost match the price of our cars. I am assuming that if we were stopped - we were not going the legal limit, safe assumption?
Originally Posted by bobs
Umm, no its not. FCC regulations apply to all frequencies of the electromagnetic spectrum. Besides, even if they're not familiar with the FCC regs, they can always bust you for interfering with a police officer or some such offense. Bottom line is if you're going to try and jam something, don't get caught. It will be painful and expensive if you do.
Laser Jammers and Radar Jammers are illegal in the states of Nebraska, Minnesota, Utah, California, Oklahoma, Virginia, Colorado, Illinois and Washington DC. If you decide to use a laser jammer in one of the states that they are outlawed, consider getting the Blinder M-20 or M-40 or the Lidakek LE-30. The Blinder and the Lidatek are the only laser jammers made today that give minimal "error codes" to the police laser guns.
Take anything you read on radarbusters with a grain of salt. That site was oroginally created because the owned had (has) an axe to grind with Mike Valentine. All of the info there appears to have a certain "spin" to it.
re: Jamming. Check Section 333 of the Communications Act of 1934 & get back to me, OK?
re: Jamming. Check Section 333 of the Communications Act of 1934 & get back to me, OK?
Originally Posted by bobs
Take anything you read on radarbusters with a grain of salt. That site was oroginally created because the owned had (has) an axe to grind with Mike Valentine. All of the info there appears to have a certain "spin" to it.
re: Jamming. Check Section 333 of the Communications Act of 1934 & get back to me, OK?
re: Jamming. Check Section 333 of the Communications Act of 1934 & get back to me, OK?
This is the FCC compliance code that every electronic device legally has to abide by:
This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC Rules Operation is subject to the following two conditions: this device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation.
They may get you by saying your device causes harmfull interference. But it only emits IR waves at around 904nm since the only transmitting portion is the IR laser diode, which is the same that the laser guns use. Police laser guns shoot out an IR laser beam not to be confused with radar guns which shoot radio waves..
Granted all are electromagnetic waves, but the FCC regulates radio waves.
It's a state statute so the issue of any city regulations is moot. Since the FCC does not regulate the visual spectrum, just the electromagnetic (radio, etc.), and IR is technically visible light, it is not a federal question, and thus not subject to federal regulation, so it is left to each individual state to regulate such items.
Originally Posted by MAKIII
To all the Virginia Crossfire owqners - could you imagine getting caught with this equip. in your car and breaking the +20mph barrier, speeding, reckless driving fines and this - the fines would almost match the price of our cars. I am assuming that if we were stopped - we were not going the legal limit, safe assumption?
I've been looking into the Blinder system and will seriously consider it because of my need for speed.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2005 Ragtop
Wheels, Brakes, Tires and Suspension
7
Oct 3, 2015 03:01 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)



