Crossfire SRT6 A place to discuss SRT-6 specific topics.

SRT vs. 370z

Old Mar 19, 2009 | 02:06 PM
  #21 (permalink)  
///SilverSaphRT6's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 1
From: Easley,South Carolina
Default Re: SRT vs. 370z

Was stuck on getting a Z51 vette until I got my SRT-6...To hell with a vette, our cars are unique as hell. I have maybe seen a total of 3 base models. Haven't seen a 6 in my town.
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 02:15 PM
  #22 (permalink)  
Bulldogger's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 665
Likes: 1
Default Re: SRT vs. 370z

Originally Posted by ///SilverSaphRT6
Was stuck on getting a Z51 vette until I got my SRT-6...To hell with a vette, our cars are unique as hell. I have maybe seen a total of 3 base models. Haven't seen a 6 in my town.
You sound like my wife the reason I no longer have my ZO6
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 06:40 PM
  #23 (permalink)  
lacerdaschoon's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 340
Likes: 1
From: Australia
Default Re: SRT vs. 370z

I think the 370Z is hot, ive always been a fan of the Z's. This one has more purpose in terms of speed, Its a quick car, our srt just happens to be quicker The thing that bothers me about the Z is that its NA, ive tried to mod the 350z to no avail, waste of money outside of going FI. Great car for its price though, ill deff be going for a test drive when it arrives on my shores.
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 07:22 PM
  #24 (permalink)  
Illegal Machine's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 430
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Default Re: SRT vs. 370z

Originally Posted by 70GT6
SRT6 is an easy win. Even stock.
hp on the 370 is 332 hp but at 7000+rpm and tq is 270.

the SRT is full on much sooner and has a much wider power band

Road & Track tested and came up with 13.7 in the quarter- any quicker claim is very optimistic. Same mag scored a 13.3 in the SRT.

Skidpad the z does do slightly better....congrats.
Um. No. No. No.

Road & Track got a 13.7, but Motortrend ran a 13.3 @ 105.7. This car is VERY MUCH comparable to a stock SRT-6 in a straight line.

Someone on Dragtimes trapped 106.

Hell, the last couple model year 350Zs were running around a 13.7.

The skidpad isn't even CLOSE. R&T scored a .9 in the SRT-6. The 370Z pulled .99g.

Braking was the same thing. 370 is around 106ft, I've seen 112-113ft for the SRT-6.
 
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2009 | 03:59 AM
  #25 (permalink)  
antonio311's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Default Re: SRT vs. 370z

Originally Posted by Illegal Machine
Um. No. No. No.

Road & Track got a 13.7, but Motortrend ran a 13.3 @ 105.7. This car is VERY MUCH comparable to a stock SRT-6 in a straight line.

Someone on Dragtimes trapped 106.

Hell, the last couple model year 350Zs were running around a 13.7.

The skidpad isn't even CLOSE. R&T scored a .9 in the SRT-6. The 370Z pulled .99g.

Braking was the same thing. 370 is around 106ft, I've seen 112-113ft for the SRT-6.
I'm pretty sure our srt's will toast the 370's....easily.
 
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2009 | 09:39 AM
  #26 (permalink)  
Illegal Machine's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 430
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Default Re: SRT vs. 370z

Originally Posted by antonio311
I'm pretty sure our srt's will toast the 370's....easily.
"Easily"? I'd like to know how you're "pretty sure" about that.

Seeing as how this thread was started by a guy with a modded SRT-6 who only put 1 car on a stock 370Z, I'm not sure how you can say that.

They'll run a low 13 at 103-106. We run low 13's at 104-107.
 
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2009 | 04:10 PM
  #27 (permalink)  
msheredy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Forum Regular
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 953
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
Default Re: SRT vs. 370z

Originally Posted by Illegal Machine
Seeing as how this thread was started by a guy with a modded SRT-6 who only put 1 car on a stock 370Z, I'm not sure how you can say that.
Whoa, First you make this statement. To which you are surprised with the results.

Only a car with an intake and exhaust?
Then you make this one in which you change your view as an unfair race because of my modded SRT to which I barely won.

Seeing as how this thread was started by a guy with a modded SRT-6 who only put 1 car on a stock 370Z, I'm not sure how you can say that.
Regardless both cars are quick mine was just quicker.

Originally Posted by me
... he doesn't go for it yet so I short shift into 2nd and then the ******* goes for it! I proceed to do the same, we're dead even–even though he is still in first gear, right in his powerband.
I just felt pretty damn good though since I didn't have to play catchup. I put that car on him while bogged in 2nd and was just beginning to put more on him before he gave up. Should we have gone through the gears it would have only been worse—for him.

Oh and by the way...

Originally Posted by Illegal Machine
370z's are fast as hell.
370z's are hardly fast as hell. Now the Caparo T1, that is fast and quick as hell since that is what we are really debating here is the quickness of these cars.
 
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2009 | 04:18 PM
  #28 (permalink)  
Illegal Machine's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 430
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Default Re: SRT vs. 370z

Originally Posted by msheredy

Then you make this one in which you change your view as an unfair race because of my modded SRT to which I barely won.
Where did I say it was an unfair race? Just pointing out to the people saying that the 370 is slow that a modded SRT-6 was only able to put 1 car on it. That's pretty impressive for an N/A V6.

Was I surprised by the results? YES. I've driven a 370Z. I figured it would run straight up or slightly behind a stock SRT-6. Only losing by a car to an SRT-6 with an intake and exhaust is extremely impressive.

That N/A 3.7L can do everything our 3.5 S/C can do and more. Oh, and the MSRP is about $15K less. Extremely respectable. Insane value.

Originally Posted by msheredy
370z's are hardly fast as hell. Now the Caparo T1, that is fast and quick as hell since that is what we are really debating here is the quickness of these cars.
For 31K getting a new car that can pull a low 13 in the 1/4 and a .99g on the skid pad. That is fast as hell. Why you pulled the Caparo T1 into this conversation is beyond me.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 11:14 AM
  #29 (permalink)  
msheredy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Forum Regular
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 953
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
Default Re: SRT vs. 370z

Originally Posted by Illegal Machine
Was I surprised by the results? YES. I've driven a 370Z. I figured it would run straight up or slightly behind a stock SRT-6. Only losing by a car to an SRT-6 with an intake and exhaust is extremely impressive.
Well for the sake of argument then he did have the upper hand in this race because he was in first while I was in second [bogging] and I still beat him so there.

For 31K getting a new car that can pull a low 13 in the 1/4 and a .99g on the skid pad. That is fast as hell.
Didn't know we were talking about a price point here. (I guess your conversations must constantly evolve to make you appear wiser )

Well if price point is your basis for a ride that's "fast a hell" (again what a generic comment, but what ever) How about a GSXR1000—$13,000 now that's half the cost of your beloved 370.

BTW if you like to car so damn much sell your SRT and get one of those This forum doesn't need hypocrites such as yourself touting how another car is superior in certain aspects blah blah blah.

Why you pulled the Caparo T1 into this conversation is beyond me.
Because that car is "fast as hell"
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 11:28 AM
  #30 (permalink)  
mrphotoman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,665
Likes: 5
Default Re: SRT vs. 370z

Originally Posted by Illegal Machine
Where did I say it was an unfair race? Just pointing out to the people saying that the 370 is slow that a modded SRT-6 was only able to put 1 car on it. That's pretty impressive for an N/A V6.

Was I surprised by the results? YES. I've driven a 370Z. I figured it would run straight up or slightly behind a stock SRT-6. Only losing by a car to an SRT-6 with an intake and exhaust is extremely impressive.

That N/A 3.7L can do everything our 3.5 S/C can do and more. Oh, and the MSRP is about $15K less. Extremely respectable. Insane value.


For 31K getting a new car that can pull a low 13 in the 1/4 and a .99g on the skid pad. That is fast as hell. Why you pulled the Caparo T1 into this conversation is beyond me.
So a simple pulley swap on the N/A 3.7L will yeild as good as or more of a hp increase as it would on the 3.5 SC motor?
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 01:54 PM
  #31 (permalink)  
antonio311's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Default Re: SRT vs. 370z

I also think the SRt will outlast the 370 over the years. Usually Daimler & even Chrysler products last longer than the asian products. At least in my experiences they have.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 02:38 PM
  #32 (permalink)  
j-fire's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 689
Likes: 3
From: iowa.
Default Re: SRT vs. 370z

you have to admit, the BMW E46 M3 is kind of a legend, and now nissan has a similar sized motor, 'naturally aspirated' making pretty close power. THAT is pretty cool.

but because of the nature of nissan's power curve in the 370Z, it is true, in 'real-time' racing on the streets, a 370Z is not going to have the consistent power to beat the SRT6 even stock-for-stock. the torque of the VQ motors takes some revs.

i know because i already beat one. 5 times. from a dig and from a roll.

 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 02:56 PM
  #33 (permalink)  
mrphotoman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,665
Likes: 5
Default Re: SRT vs. 370z

Originally Posted by antonio311
I also think the SRt will outlast the 370 over the years. Usually Daimler & even Chrysler products last longer than the asian products. At least in my experiences they have.
Lol that sure hasn't been my experience in the past with Chrysler.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 03:12 PM
  #34 (permalink)  
+fireamx's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,509
Likes: 7
From: Akron, Ohio
Default Re: SRT vs. 370z

Originally Posted by antonio311
I also think the SRt will outlast the 370 over the years. Usually Daimler & even Chrysler products last longer than the asian products. At least in my experiences they have.

Antonio, what exactly do you mean when you say "outlast". Are you talking about body/chassis corrosion resistance? Or mechanical durability.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 08:33 PM
  #35 (permalink)  
Illegal Machine's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 430
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Default Re: SRT vs. 370z

Originally Posted by msheredy
Didn't know we were talking about a price point here. (I guess your conversations must constantly evolve to make you appear wiser )
Says the guy who brought up the Caparo T1 to make it seem like I don't know what "fast" is. Because all of us SRT-6 owners are really just saving up to buy an F-1 car with a fiberglass body on it.

Originally Posted by msheredy
Well if price point is your basis for a ride that's "fast a hell" (again what a generic comment, but what ever) How about a GSXR1000—$13,000 now that's half the cost of your beloved 370.
Yes. A GSXR1000 is fast as hell. Gotta love the price point for bikes.

"Fast as Hell" is relative.

I think a bone stock SRT-6 is fast as hell. You'll be hard pressed to find a bone stock (relative!!) 2 seater that is capable of a 12.9 bone stock.

For a bone stock car, the 370Z is extremely fast. Put in in some corners and watch the hell out.

Originally Posted by msheredy
BTW if you like to car so damn much sell your SRT and get one of those This forum doesn't need hypocrites such as yourself touting how another car is superior in certain aspects blah blah blah.
Where was I a hypocrite? The SRT-6 is an inferior handling car. It's only offered in auto. It's 4 years old. It depreciates horribly. Luckily for me, it's combination of rarity, straight line performance and depreciated cost made it very appealing to me (I think 99% of the people where would agree).

I'm realistic.

Which is NOT the case with most of the guys on this forum who put cars in the following categories:

A) The SRT-6 is faster

or

B) It may be faster, but it's for ricers!!

C) And it's ugly anyways!

D) But look how expensive it is!

E) But if I add THIS mod and THIS mod and THIS mod, I'll be faster!

Look, guys. It took Nissan ALLLLLLL these years, but they finally put out a car that is VERY close to our in straight line speed, but will eat it up in the corners.

It's been YEARS and nobody has come close. Finally, Nissan has. Give them some credit. As a car enthusiast, I think it's great Nissan took a dependable platform, removed weigh (how often does THAT happen now-a-days) and increased horse power! I think it's great.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 08:40 PM
  #36 (permalink)  
Illegal Machine's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 430
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Default Re: SRT vs. 370z

Originally Posted by mrphotoman
So a simple pulley swap on the N/A 3.7L will yeild as good as or more of a hp increase as it would on the 3.5 SC motor?
Oh, I totally agree. But that isn't what I'm talking about.

If you took a 350Z and told me it went low 13 or a high 12, I'd SWEAR you were spraying Nitrous or added forced induction. The fact that Nissan has already got it down in that region ALL MOTOR is very impressive.

Take a 370Z and add an intake, tune, exhaust and a cam and you'll already be where it took a twin turbo system on the 350Z. Again, that's damn impressive.

But to get in the low 12's-high 11's with a 370Z...it still isn't going to happen without spraying the car, or adding a TT or S/C kit. That's just the reality of it. Sucks for them.

That's why you have to love a factory forced induction vehicle.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 08:47 PM
  #37 (permalink)  
lacerdaschoon's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 340
Likes: 1
From: Australia
Default Re: SRT vs. 370z

And thats precisely why i personaly wouldnt buy the Z. For a stock car its quick, very impressive very hot but its just not FI. Great value for $ Good job Nissan..
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 08:54 PM
  #38 (permalink)  
j-fire's Avatar
Forum Regular
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 689
Likes: 3
From: iowa.
Default Re: SRT vs. 370z

i have to agree with illegalmachine on the fact that our SRT-6's do not handle well comparably.

i would go so far as to say (regardless of all my suspension mods) that it's the worst-handling sports car i have owned. even my jaguar handled better, especially after putting in a coilover kit.

the SRT is great in a straight line, but when i put it through the twisties, it's actually a little 'scary.'
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 09:07 PM
  #39 (permalink)  
mrphotoman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,665
Likes: 5
Default Re: SRT vs. 370z

[quote=Illegal Machine]Oh, I totally agree. But that isn't what I'm talking about.

If you took a 350Z and told me it went low 13 or a high 12, I'd SWEAR you were spraying Nitrous or added forced induction. The fact that Nissan has already got it down in that region ALL MOTOR is very impressive.

Take a 370Z and add an intake, tune, exhaust and a cam and you'll already be where it took a twin turbo system on the 350Z. Again, that's damn impressive.

But to get in the low 12's-high 11's with a 370Z...it still isn't going to happen without spraying the car, or adding a TT or S/C kit. That's just the reality of it. Sucks for them.

That's why you have to love a factory forced induction vehicle. [/quote]

lol that was the point i was trying to make.

the 370z is substantially better than the 350z but i really do not care for them because they will be a common sight on the road before long.

nissan makes top quality cars though, no arguing about that.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 09:09 PM
  #40 (permalink)  
mrphotoman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,665
Likes: 5
Default Re: SRT vs. 370z

Originally Posted by j-fire
i have to agree with illegalmachine on the fact that our SRT-6's do not handle well comparably.

i would go so far as to say (regardless of all my suspension mods) that it's the worst-handling sports car i have owned. even my jaguar handled better, especially after putting in a coilover kit.

the SRT is great in a straight line, but when i put it through the twisties, it's actually a little 'scary.'
yeah it is a little light in the rear, i was really supprised at how "scary" it feels in the curves. It feels like that rear end always wants to break loose.
 
Reply


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:56 AM.